You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
Now online (3)
belb
ijonspeches
Indeksical
...and 7 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2555040
Today 8
Topics 124217
  
 
Messageboard index
bet he posts here
 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 19:42 [#02573402]
Points: 23805 Status: Addict



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 20:03 [#02573407]
Points: 21186 Status: Lurker



Wazuuuuuuup
My rented room was maybe slightly larger, probably had more
bugs in it too. There were nearly indestructible tiny fruit
flies that fit in through the wind screen mesh itself and
through cracks around the window even though it was closed.
There would be 40 of these things flying around a tiny room,
open the water filter and there's 10 floating in the water
you're trying to filter/drink (using an alex jones pro-pure
filter you can buy on infowarsstore.com!!). Since it is
illegal to repair the window since it's illegal to own
property, I got 2 clear trash bags, taped them together and
completely sealed the window, now there were only like 2
flies per day somehow instead of 40. And that was just the
flies, the tiny roach like things and crawling dustmite
things were worse. There was this innocent guy who got sent
to prison "accidentally". In a documentary, he said there
were thousands of roaches crawling on the ceiling falling
down on him. They do this on purpose, we're run by
criminals.

The solution is a term I coined called:
"home restisteading"
a combo of homesteading (a normal way to acquire something
that doesn't involve force and thus is in line with the non
aggression principle) and restitution (having the fascist
elite pay restitution for all their theft and crimes).
It's easy, everything that is illegitimately owned can be
homesteaded. This includes all apartment rentals since
landlords are in collusion with NAP violating government
(who force u to pay taxes/go to school etc) to force you to
rent there cuz the governments illegitimate law prevents
homesteading. Each person can homestead essentially their
city's available land divided by city's population. Anyone
who "owns" more than that is initiating force on the ability
of others to live somewhere/pursue happiness, so anything
owned by anyone over that amount can be homesteaded too.
This is natural law since there is no real law anymore, just
criminal fascists running everything.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 20:05 [#02573408]
Points: 21186 Status: Lurker



And all government owned stuff can be homesteaded too,
roads, schools, etc. For any free market business that wants
to own more than their share, they have to purchase it from
people who voluntarily want to sell parts of their share.


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 20:10 [#02573411]
Points: 23805 Status: Addict



Could I live up a tree on a traffic island if I wanted?


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 20:12 [#02573412]
Points: 23805 Status: Addict



LAZY_TITLE

excuse the daily mail link, but there is a village called
chew magna?


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 20:23 [#02573415]
Points: 23805 Status: Addict



wmv you said trash bags you must be american


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 20:31 [#02573416]
Points: 21186 Status: Lurker | Followup to Hyperflake: #02573411



Ethically, yeah, the government doesn't legitimately own
streets. The individuals in government can homestead their 1
share of land themselves, but everything they own beyond
that was stolen. I'm basing home restisteading on the non
aggression axiom. Walter block uses NAP as an axiom to
calculate stuff to like this: is it ethical for an
individual to own a nuke or a gun? nuke no, gun yes, why?
Because a gun can specifically be used in self defense (the
only force legitimate under the non aggression principle)
against specific attackers, whereas the nuke would have
collateral damage of innocent non-attackers. A nuke would be
ok to own on the moon or something if one person owned all
the property in the explosion radius and nobody else was in
it. Is abortion ok? He split it into 2 parts, eviction of
the infant is ok (if its from a rape etc and living in the
property of your body w/o your consent) but only if it can
be kept alive w/o killing it external to the body. Well I
say owning more land than the land divided by population is
initiating force on the ability of others to own land and
live, it's absolutely asymmetric/non-level playing field.
Owning land is the root building block of a free market imo.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 20:31 [#02573417]
Points: 21186 Status: Lurker | Followup to Hyperflake: #02573415



What do you use, your mom's vagina?


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 20:35 [#02573419]
Points: 23805 Status: Addict | Followup to w M w: #02573417



you just said mom!


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 20:37 [#02573420]
Points: 23805 Status: Addict | Followup to w M w: #02573416



The main issue I have with the libertarian concept of
owning an automatic weapon, is when the government does
close up shop and round up dissidents it will be pretty
useless to own an assault rifle cos they will be using tanks
and APC's and drones


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 20:38 [#02573421]
Points: 23805 Status: Addict



Land ownership is a strange concept, cos a lot of hereditary
land was distributed before their was a house of commons and
us as plebeians had a shitty part of the deal,


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 20:44 [#02573422]
Points: 21186 Status: Lurker | Followup to Hyperflake: #02573419



Is mom the secret word of the day?
LAZY_TITLE
It might be near a checkmate scenario. The golden rule
should be the non aggression principle, not 'he who has the
gold makes the rules'. Life would very likely be much much
better for everyone.


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 20:55 [#02573423]
Points: 23805 Status: Addict | Followup to w M w: #02573422



it was just another Americanism I noticed, unless your very
cleaver and double bluffing and your actually not American!

yeah Its just abritrary really who gets to own land and
resources as far as I concerned, I was reading some danish
billionares owe vast swaths of the scottish countryside



 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2019-04-04 21:03 [#02573424]
Points: 21186 Status: Lurker



I'm from poshnu, tuvulu, united kingdom. It's not wise to
post your address online, especially since the government
probably pays trolls, the type who do IRL stuff like
'targeted individual', but its hopeless since google, an in
q tel government/fascist tentacle, geolocates everyone and
we're all code running inside google earth:
LAZY_TITLE
golden rule:
LAZY_TITLE


 


Messageboard index