strange apollo pics. | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
giginger
big
...and 194 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613412
Today 4
Topics 127499
  
 
Messageboard index
strange apollo pics.
 

offline freqy on 2017-02-18 23:50 [#02513468]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




LAZY_TITLE

look at both pictures. look at identical mountains and only
a moon lander craft in the one picture : /


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 00:23 [#02513470]
Points: 6514 Status: Lurker



no telling how far away those mountains are, if the thingy
travelled toward them then that would be the that rh shot


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 00:27 [#02513471]
Points: 6514 Status: Lurker



see what u mean tho, bit suspish


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 00:30 [#02513472]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



ic on right looks like it was taken at the left side of the
lander, also mountains are literally miles high, walking
hundreds of feet away wouldn't make any appreciable
difference of height on photo


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 00:33 [#02513473]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



they look like smaller than they are cos of greyscazle and
no atmospheric effects like gradient bluing, astronauts on
the moon couldnt tell how far away things were cos they
didnt have the same colour as stuff in earths atmosphere,
things on earth like hills look more bluer the further they
are away because of scattering of light in atmosphere, on
moon things look much nearer


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 00:35 [#02513474]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline freqy on 2017-02-19 01:21 [#02513477]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



yes, the mountains are pictured at a different angle.

The pic on the right would have to be taken to the right
side of the lander,
the lander would be on the left side of the right side pic

there are 6 cross hairs visible on the right photo

look at the mountains right between the two cross hairs on
the far right side of the right picture

*.......*.......*

............... here

*.......*.......*

right there are two mountains one far away, one near.

there is less of that far mountain in the right photo, than
in the left photo.

so the camera must have tracked right for that far mountain
to have disappeared behind the near mountain.



 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 06:17 [#02513481]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



I mean i must admit it does really look like a Kubrick
studio set but i think evidence that they landed on the moon
is unequivocal, unless they are photoshopping stuff 40 years
later

LAZY_TITLE


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 06:22 [#02513482]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



I think the vast amount of people involved tens of thousands
it would be preactically imossible to fraud

LAZY_TITLE

LAZY_TITLE




 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 06:37 [#02513483]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



LAZY_TITLE

i suppose the only thing that would satisfy most nay sayers
would be another country landing on the moon and confirming
the existence of all the gear u there, even then i think you
would get people doubting it as it was such a monumental
task at the time it was done.

It would be nice to have 3rfd party confirmation to but it
all to rest . ive been to nasa and saw a saturn 5 and im
99.9% confident it was capable of actually taking men to the
moon. Its just colossal and all the infrastructure they have
their is colossal, if they didnt go to the moon i hope
someone kept the receipts as they were spending a sizable
amount of their gdp to get there.


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 06:40 [#02513484]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



also apollo program had two failures very first one Apollo 1
3 astronauts died in pressurised high oxygen atmosphere that
ignited in the capsule


 

offline freqy on 2017-02-19 12:11 [#02513490]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




We were uploading the LRO pictures a couple years ago, of
the landing sites.

I just thought the picture of the mountains was odd , until
i looked a bit more closely.

Some pictures may have been taken on Earth for the media.



 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 12:14 [#02513491]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



yeah i must admit none of them are 100% convincing cos we
have nothing to compare them too,


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 12:20 [#02513492]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



lost cosmonauts


 

offline RussellDust on 2017-02-19 19:25 [#02513533]
Points: 16053 Status: Lurker



So what? Do you feel violated, freckles?


 

offline freqy on 2017-02-19 22:12 [#02513553]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




wow never thought, that Gagarin was only recognised as the
first into space because he was the first to make it back
alive. : 0



 

offline freqy on 2017-02-19 22:12 [#02513554]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



howd y mean dusty?



 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 22:18 [#02513555]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline freqy on 2017-02-19 22:21 [#02513556]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



y must have seen this.

LAZY_TITLE


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 22:26 [#02513557]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



yes it looks like the john glenn fireflies, the most amazing
one was the lights that entered the space station

i'll try and find it


 

offline freqy on 2017-02-19 22:26 [#02513558]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline freqy on 2017-02-19 22:28 [#02513559]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




I think the bright flashy living things at the bottom of
the ocean are alien enough for me.



 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 22:29 [#02513560]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



you mean like the abyss, i love that film


 

offline freqy on 2017-02-19 22:31 [#02513561]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




like the actual flashy living things at the bottom of the
ocean.!!



 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 22:31 [#02513562]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline freqy on 2017-02-19 22:32 [#02513563]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 22:33 [#02513564]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



yes they are so beautiful, still i wouldn't want one to swim
up my bum


 

offline freqy on 2017-02-19 22:42 [#02513566]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




interesting ..maybe its the radiation in their skull?



 

offline freqy on 2017-02-19 22:44 [#02513567]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




i mean ..regards your link.

not sure how to respond regards the alien fish swimming up
your bum.
lol


 

offline freqy on 2017-02-19 22:46 [#02513568]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




Just looked funny me saying hmm..interesting..maybe its the
radiation in their skull?.... that puts you off, regards
them swimming up your bum.



 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 22:46 [#02513569]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker | Followup to freqy: #02513566



yes i thought about cosmic rays but they are well documented
from the earliest days of space travel like a flash in your
retina or internally, i dont think they look like they
happened externally but i could be wrong


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 22:47 [#02513570]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



i think the whole of space is swimming with weird organisms
like space plankton thats my personal feeling


 

offline freqy on 2017-02-19 22:51 [#02513571]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




how do we go warp speed through them? how´d we plot a
course?


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 22:55 [#02513572]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



even if we are travelling a faction of the speed of light i
read its theoretically possible to colonise the entire
galaxy in just 3 million years.


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-19 23:00 [#02513573]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



any possible answer is mind blowing


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2017-02-20 07:32 [#02513597]
Points: 14291 Status: Lurker | Followup to freqy: #02513563



drexciya mx LAZY_TITLE


 

offline freqy on 2017-02-20 16:59 [#02513607]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



cool.




 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-20 17:17 [#02513609]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker | Followup to mappatazee: #02513597



imagine something gigantic and metallically cold brushing
past you in the dark, and making loud horn noises


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-20 17:18 [#02513610]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



another great drexciya youtube vid


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2017-02-20 17:19 [#02513611]
Points: 31006 Status: Lurker



giant honking underwater fish with glowing emerald gonads in
their foreheads


 


Messageboard index