Ottawa | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 126 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613449
Today 2
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
Ottawa
 

offline SignedUpToLOL from Zuckuss fanfiction (United Kingdom) on 2014-10-22 18:11 [#02478105]
Points: 2853 Status: Regular



Let's seize the Twitter Storm and get Xltronic trending for
this topic.

Oh and, Renee Zellweger.


 

offline RussellDust on 2014-10-22 18:17 [#02478106]
Points: 16053 Status: Lurker



I'm in, but I'm not quite sure what to do. Hashtags and
shit? I'm a rubbish Twitter N00b.

I did a tweet the other day, no hashtag and yet I get a
message that it was trending.Some total stranger even
favourited it. WTtwitter?


 

offline SignedUpToLOL from Zuckuss fanfiction (United Kingdom) on 2014-10-22 18:19 [#02478107]
Points: 2853 Status: Regular



NO! We need to make Xltronic the "go to" Media Node. We need
an alternative to hashtag, maybe;

$wMw : Ottawa

or

wMw.hotTopic("Ottawa");

and people can cross-pollinate "wMw"'s, socially.


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2014-10-22 18:26 [#02478110]
Points: 31145 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



https://twitter.com/ma2comohamed


 

offline SignedUpToLOL from Zuckuss fanfiction (United Kingdom) on 2014-10-22 19:00 [#02478113]
Points: 2853 Status: Regular



Let's make @ma2comohamed the de facto Twitter account for
breaking news pertinent to Xltronicans, especially
jaser who seems lost and confused.


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2014-10-22 19:13 [#02478114]
Points: 31145 Status: Regular | Followup to SignedUpToLOL: #02478113 | Show recordbag



i didn't even post a rip for mark bell


 

offline drill rods from 6AM-8PM NO PARKING (Canada) on 2014-10-22 23:17 [#02478134]
Points: 1171 Status: Regular



Not surprised at all. This is what you get when you declare
war on islamists - that is what they want you to do -
it gives them an excuse. The Quebec car killer affiliated
himself with ISIS and I'd bet it'll turn out that this one
did too.

War has changed. Troops and jets and tanks are for
state-on-state wars. This is a completely different
situation and requires completely different tactics. Best
way to deal with these cunts IMO is to arm their more
immediate enemies in Iraq and Syria, and help those that
they have displaced. Going right after them ourselves makes
us targets which we would not have previously been.



 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2014-10-23 00:05 [#02478137]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to drill rods: #02478134



seems you are more worried about you being the target. u kno
what terrorists really want is for you to be scared of them
so u do what they want u to. thats the point. heads on
spikes? its to scare u.

are you too scared to deal with violence? thats ok but just
admit it instead of making a 'case' for it.


 

offline RussellDust on 2014-10-23 00:10 [#02478140]
Points: 16053 Status: Lurker | Followup to drill rods: #02478134



My opinions, no judgement.

"This is what you get when you declare war on islamists"

War on islamists? There's no such thing going on.

"War has changed. Troops and jets and tanks are for
state-on-state wars"

War has changed a lot, but it's far more complex than that,
even "state-on-state".

"Best way to deal with these cunts IMO is to arm their more
immediate enemies in Iraq and Syria"

If you do a bit of research you will notice that every time
the US arm a "minority" it backfires in some way or another.
Look at what happened when the USA helped Afghanistan by
arming the mujahideen to fight Russia.

"Going right after them ourselves makes us targets which we
would not have previously been."

"Ourselves"? "targets we would not have previously been"?

I understand when you say "ourselves" you don't actually
include yourself, but what do you think, that "we" should
fight "them" with drones, or that "others" should fight
them?



 

offline drill rods from 6AM-8PM NO PARKING (Canada) on 2014-10-23 00:11 [#02478142]
Points: 1171 Status: Regular | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02478137



No, it's just that I would prefer to deal with violence by
means other than more violence, which frankly is nonsensical
in an asymmetric warfare situation.

Bombing some twats in the desert will not actually stop
people from being converted to islamofacist ideology or
acting upon it. Does anyone actually think it will?



 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2014-10-23 00:16 [#02478144]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular



i used to say that one. 'terrorists want us to fight them'
'so its better if we just act like they dont affect us'
'better if we joke about them' 'better if we dont even look
at them' 'better if we dont draw cartoons' 'dont offend them
or else'

u are doing what they want. we could smash em and free
thousands of their potential victims but....we've made a lot
of excuses not to and now they are pretty big.



 

offline drill rods from 6AM-8PM NO PARKING (Canada) on 2014-10-23 00:25 [#02478145]
Points: 1171 Status: Regular | Followup to RussellDust: #02478140



"War on islamists? There's no such thing going on." - Lots
of rhetoric in parliament about going hard on ISIS, so
anyone with islamofascist leanings will certainly take it as
meaning a war. They deserve to be blown to bits, don't get
me wrong, but bombing them will inevitably result in
domestic backlash like this. It gives them the "excuse" they
crave. Today's attack, and the recent one in QC, were
blatantly because of Canada's recent commitment to bomb
ISIS

"If you do a bit of research you will notice that every time

the US arm a "minority" it backfires in some way or another.

Look at what happened when the USA helped Afghanistan by
arming the mujahideen to fight Russia. "

True, of course. If we arm the Kurds I would half-expect
some future backlash in the form of Kurdish nationalism,
perhaps spilling over into Turkey. No easy answers.

All I know is that if Canada joins in with Obama's bombing
of ISIS, very little will improve in Iraq. But Canada will
become a target. Any collateral damage will be used by
islamofascists as fuel for their propaganda, worsening
domestic threats in the West. Tightening domestic security
will also inevitably convert more people to the cause. I'd
rather we try to keep the disease localised.




 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2014-10-23 00:34 [#02478146]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular



has anyone got any real data that backs up the assumption
that military intervention creates terrorism? it gets said
all the time

we all know there is a grain of truth


 

offline drill rods from 6AM-8PM NO PARKING (Canada) on 2014-10-23 01:04 [#02478147]
Points: 1171 Status: Regular | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02478146



"has anyone got any real data that backs up the assumption
that military intervention creates terrorism? it gets said
all the time "

Well, surely you can look at what terrorists themselves
state as their reasons? The London tube bombers wanted
revenge for the Afghan and Iraq wars, Hamas want revenge for
those killed by previous IDF incursions, etc

Maybe we can smash ISIS militarily, but we cannot use drones
to smash the ideology of religious fascism. You can't bomb
an ideology. It craves attention. If we give it attention,
it grows. Every new war plays into the hands of those who
bang on about the West's "War on Islam", will result in
accidental civilian deaths which they can use for
propaganda, and provide more captives whose heads can be cut
off on youtube.

Military action satisfies our urge to beat up the bad guys -
fair enough, but it doesn't make the actual problem go away.
The target should be the ideology itself.

p.s. IDM


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2014-10-23 01:31 [#02478152]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular



----

dont listen to terrorists. obviously they will talk like
they are persecuted.

what about elliot rodger? you feel like listening to him? he
had a video explaining why he was a victim and why people
deserved to be killed.

instead why dont u try listening to the muslims who arent
terrorists. they are asking for some help btw.



 

offline drill rods from 6AM-8PM NO PARKING (Canada) on 2014-10-23 01:58 [#02478154]
Points: 1171 Status: Regular | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02478152



I don't listen to terrorists, but impressionable young-adult
males do listen to them, and are swayed by them. It is
this that we should be trying to prevent. I am not
sympathizing with them - I am simply recognizing the factors
that drive them to turn to violent extremism, and suggesting
that we mitigate those factors. Direct military action plugs
right into the propaganda they use to further their cause
(the west is at war with islam, kills innocent muslims etc).
Their propaganda is all reprehensible bollocks, but it
clearly works, because they use it to recruit members. So,
we should try to prevent it from working.

If you're comparing islamofascists with Elliot Rodger then
you are confused. Islamofascists are (justifiably but
misguidedly) targeted by Western state militaries, and are
thus more able to get new recruits thanks to their
propaganda methods. I'm not sure how any of that applies to
frustrated virgins.

Innocent civilians in Iraq need aid, but I think this is
best given by propping them up with arms and humanitarian
assistance. Anything else will give oxygen to islamofascist
propaganda, and encourage it to spread to the West.

Sometimes reading your posts I wonder if you think I
actually sympathize with cunts like ISIS and the two
Canadian terrorists. Do you understand that I don't?


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2014-10-23 02:19 [#02478155]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to drill rods: #02478154



u dont sympathise with terrorists but you are making excuses
for them without quite realizing it. everyone has been doing
it and i cant really blame you for thinking its rational.
but its not actually very rational.

now, my favs are a nightmare to trawl thru and i fucking
hope u appreciate it but i found this. pls dont make me feel
like i wasted time.

LAZY_TITLE

it takes its findings from what i gathered at the time were
some good sources. as always if im wrong im really into
hearing that and i want to be pointed to some better thing.
but pls read


 

offline SignedUpToLOL from Zuckuss fanfiction (United Kingdom) on 2014-10-23 02:43 [#02478161]
Points: 2853 Status: Regular



Great stuff guys!


 

offline drill rods from 6AM-8PM NO PARKING (Canada) on 2014-10-23 03:27 [#02478171]
Points: 1171 Status: Regular | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02478155



I do actually agree with those points to a fair degree
(agree completely with 2,3,5). Using actual data gets my
thumbs-up

Points 1 and 4 are key here - I would like to see air
strikes against ISIS, especially targeted drone strikes
against key leaders. I just want local powers to do it (UAE,
Kuwait etc) so that the West can avoid any/all blowback -
and also because, although they pose a threat to the West,
the core fight is between ISIS and their neighbours. Should
we not be helping them to win the fight, instead of doing it
for our own reasons?

However re the risk ISIS poses to the West, none of those
points really deal with how we stamp out the underlying
ideology of islamofascism. It's not a political issue like
the Guardian supposedly said... but it's not military
either.


 

offline kurdish from Amsterdam on 2014-10-23 03:34 [#02478172]
Points: 10 Status: Regular



BBC Newsnight Report

Xltronic, home to.vicious thugs

Drill Rods was arrested today for.boring the shit out of
everyone

Zzzz. Snoozeeroonies



 

offline kurdish from Amsterdam on 2014-10-23 03:35 [#02478173]
Points: 10 Status: Regular



reggin


 

offline kurdish from Amsterdam on 2014-10-23 03:38 [#02478174]
Points: 10 Status: Regular | Followup to RussellDust: #02478140



QD, your opinion iz g


 

offline RussellDust on 2014-10-23 12:33 [#02478194]
Points: 16053 Status: Lurker | Followup to kurdish: #02478174



Quality denial? =)


 

offline belb from mmmmmmhhhhzzzz!!! on 2014-10-26 02:41 [#02478398]
Points: 6384 Status: Lurker



plus if we just sell everyone drones so we're somehow not
complicit in affecting the situation, it's gonna be like,
total kerching for our brave and moral arms dealers!


 


Messageboard index