$80 shoes. Outrageously not worth it?

�

You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register

�

(nobody)
...and 243 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...

Members 8025
Messages 2613457
Today 3
Topics 127500

Messageboard index
$80 shoes. Outrageously not worth it?

clark672010 on 2011-07-15 07:53 [#02417552]
Points: 398 Status: Lurker

So I just bought these shoes by REI for $80. I think they
are absolutely FABULOUS, but I also think I am completely
nuts for spending that much on a pair of shoes. I'm still
debating whether or not to return them and go buy something
of better use, as well as the fact that I will be broke for
the next month or so. But god, am I obsessed.
shoes here.
So, too outrageous? Keep or return.

LAZY_TITLE

taking_the_piz on 2011-07-15 08:18 [#02417558]
Points: 795 Status: Lurker

ahahahah

FABULOUS

are you a fembot? i think you are...

Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2011-07-15 08:24 [#02417561]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to taking_the_piz: #02417558

The only kind of people who use the word fabulous are 50+
year old cougars or 25+ year old gay men.

taking_the_piz on 2011-07-15 08:29 [#02417562]
Points: 795 Status: Lurker

true, but you're talking about people. and the thing is:
does this clark actually belong to the class of people?

i sense an opportunistic fembot

elusive from detroit (United States) on 2011-07-16 09:25 [#02417606]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag

there is absolutely nothing wrong with spending that much
local currency on a pair of shoes. value is the vocabulary.
feet are a sliding scale.

cheap shoes fail regularly. if you are in the spirt, next
time give the homeless a fair pair of shoes - boots,
especially if the season is winter. you will have made more
a difference than some bowl of noodles could have ever.

robbie_eleckt from time to time on 2011-07-16 16:16 [#02417617]
Points: 1401 Status: Lurker

fabulous indeed

robbie_eleckt from time to time on 2011-07-16 16:18 [#02417618]
Points: 1401 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #02417561

hey, I'm 34 and not gay
your theory = fail

wavephace from off the chain on 2011-07-16 21:37 [#02417628]
Points: 3098 Status: Lurker

clark $80 dollars for a shoes is not that much really did
you ever go into a shoes store? theres litearlly dozens of
shoes which do cost way more then $80 dollars...... some of
them even cost more then $100 dollars!!!!! having that being
said my best shoes of all times were only $20 and still are
in use but they are in rough beat up but still function and
served for many a year

chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2011-07-28 21:06 [#02418329]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker

check this guy's posting history, it's brilliant. every
topic (all 300+) is a cleverly disguised ad. seems to cut
and paste the same thing on a few boards, and the informal
style just sucks people right in...

cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2011-07-28 23:30 [#02418338]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to chaosmachine: #02418329

THANK YOU CAPTAIN OBVIOUS

Falito from Balenciaga on 2011-07-28 23:34 [#02418339]
Points: 3974 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag

horrible shoes shoes horrible

jnasato from 777gogogo (Japan) on 2011-07-29 00:03 [#02418340]
Points: 3393 Status: Regular | Show recordbag

I never pay for shoes, unless they are wooden blocks with
straps nailed to them. That is really the only way to walk.

yann_g from now on 2011-07-29 03:47 [#02418345]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker

lol bots really have crap taste in clothing

taking_the_piz on 2011-07-29 09:41 [#02418354]
Points: 795 Status: Lurker | Followup to chaosmachine: #02418329

you're a cleverly disguised ad yourself! we're all cleverly
disguised ads!

thodob from Bergen (Norway) on 2011-07-29 18:10 [#02418367]
Points: 2143 Status: Lurker

hm, bought 2 pair of shoes yesterday for approximately $275
on sale, hm...

Messageboard index