 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 (nobody)...and 332 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613461 Today 4 Topics 127500 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
always the same shit i'm gonna stop it if you don't know whta to say |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hey mohamed my brohamed. i listened your new track & i think the beat is cool & its great if it is sounds like what your going for. however to make the track more accessible to the people (one of points in my new aesthetical mode) it needs more variation & melody using simple synthasis techniques |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
thanks for listening i'm going for something that doesn't bore with the less (macro)variation make sure you check this after a while, it usually gets better with time, especially fast music. what are the simple techniques? can you post something of use please? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
my new aesthetical mode "new digital cool" uses often simple wave forms gerenated using techniques like frequensy modulate and subtrative. it is music thats accessible for the people. 1 of my upcoming albums will be a example of the style. (the other upcoming album adheres in the social aspects of new digital cool but mostly not the musical 1s) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i understand mohamed thats not what your probably going for though so carry on with your style! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i think it becomes accessible if it can be heard that it's man made at some point |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
indeed the idea of accessible is one whichs debateble. for me its usually means something with prominent melody and something like a pop song structure |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
mmm |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
for me is ear drum synthesis |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I really like it, at first I thought "oh for god's sake" but left to perculate, i like the way the other elements are introduced. It's got a "classic" feel, at home on the dance floor today or in 1992, and I mean that in a good way, whatever it is that I mean. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
do re mi fa sol la si |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
:) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
its nice. you dont need to be "accessible", but as you dont change the beat that much, maybe you could make the track more engaging by developing it faster. or giving the listener other stuff in the mix to listen to while the elements you already have move. I mean, something like planes crashing or shit like that. just not as cheessy. or you could finish it as it is and see what happens. Im off to bed now. salutations |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it's not that i chose a stripe of music to be accessible, it's just what i can do i'm surprised to find out that you need more complexity in order to make it sound better, but i don't wanna fool anyone but myself. track developes pretty fast in the first part, in fact until the first cut, if you're my passenger, time passes way slower than the actual 2'17'' check out the other beats, if you pay more attention there is enough fuckery to keep your ears engaged, but it's weighed out. you have to believe, be used to it. i understand the perplexity coming from a distant point of 'view' cheers |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
