i tried writing substep | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
-crazone
...and 348 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613462
Today 5
Topics 127501
  
 
Messageboard index
i tried writing substep
 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2010-06-18 23:38 [#02384715]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



but i still dont know how to do it

link

 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2010-06-19 00:16 [#02384725]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



i cant do this anymore, bye

 

offline bit bare pawel on 2010-06-19 00:42 [#02384731]
Points: 83 Status: Addict



that track wasn't good

 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2010-06-19 22:55 [#02384833]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



emphasis on the 1 and the 3 for the bassline and it'll be a
lot closer.


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2010-06-19 23:38 [#02384839]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular



oy! Your lazy link hijacked a youtube tab i was loading, now
i have to reload it.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2010-06-20 12:12 [#02384888]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to Fah: #02384839




That's because a lazy link specifies the same target for
each link.
Stupid behaviour, but it won't get changed. It amazes me
that this place still trundles on despite the (perceived?)
lack of management.

a href="http://LAZY_URL" target=_blank

_blank is the culprit. This defines your youtube window/tab
as _blank. When you click a subsequent lazy link it does
this:

Is there a tab called _blank?
If yes load there.
If no, open new window/tab called _blank.

To make this work correctly, don't put the target=_blank bit
at all. This way you get THE BEST behaviour:
click on link to open in current window, right click and
open in new tab to open in new unique tab (doesn't hijack an
already open tab).

It's a poor design decision by the zero man or some other
lackey. With any luck zilty V8 or whatever we are waiting
for this time will fix this... ha ha


 

offline Steinvordhosbn from London (United Kingdom) on 2010-06-20 12:35 [#02384890]
Points: 3185 Status: Regular | Followup to dave_g: #02384888 | Show recordbag



I don't think this is strictly true, or rather different
browsers interpret _blank differently (Chrome, Firefox will
open a unique tab regardless of how many other _blanks, ie8
opens a new window, Opera does its version of tabs in one
window) I know there's argument that you shouldn't use
_blank as it should be the users´choice to ctrl-click or
right click whatever but when your managing director's
asking why when he clicks a link he's taken away from the
company site it's easier to shoot a _blank in there.


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2010-06-20 15:22 [#02384896]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular | Followup to dave_g: #02384888



All in version 3 i guess, but i really hated having to
reload an entire video of i dunno how long it was.


 

Messageboard index