 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (2)dariusgriffin big ...and 235 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613470 Today 8 Topics 127501 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
'94/'95-'05 was the best decade for brain id whatever we are calling it. no need to box it into calendar decades when this is when the best stuff came out. '84/'85-'95 were the years of techno and industrial. during this time they flirted with one another, courted, had a baby (see above) but then got too old themselves and passed the torch. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
let me see if I can shine a light.. the experience of listening to music composed with the methods pioneered in the 80s and 90s has kind of dead ended, true, but only because the methods are exploitations of human emotion BY simple humans. There is a plateau related to how long it takes, how much effort it takes, how inspired one can get-- we will certainly see artists dance at that plateau, perhaps hop above it or climb a tree on top, but it will take a new technology, or more accurately a reimagination of what our present technology is capable of, to really raise the bar. But I see this as imminent. For instance: What if everyone on a dance floor had sensors on their elbows and knees (or some other body part-- i don't know the details, right) and a computer which is both responsible for the music and for detecting and implementing the feedback (nothing says this has to be elbow sensors-- there could be face recognition /emotional recognition) and suddeny the experience of dancing in front of a DJ is augmented by recent advances in the understand of human emotion. It is true that music makes people move, feel good, feel bad, annoyed, aroused, tap their feet, and it is true that certain beats make people on a dance floor move more. Well a computer that can in real time, synthesize rhythms and observe the reactions of the crowd could tailor these rhythms to agitate more violently (or more arousedly, or whatever) the nervous systems of the crowd. Hell, it could even use the audio field to target groups within the group, to stimulate and elevate the human experience of listening to such music. Then, when you consider the value of said music, created by a method like this, you would probably find all the original great stuff in music, but even more of it as contributed by the crowds of unique individuals, their motions their frequencies, and emotions. I had this idea when I was like 13, but have drugged/slacked on even trying to implement anything like it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Also, I want you all to know that I am hotter than the chick on the cover of ultra dance 11, and I wear less makeup. My stomach looks like that. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
music died in the 00's because everyone got a computer. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i think music gets better every year. it evolves, like science. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
well i've made great music and my friends have made great music, so, fuck |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
