|
|
PORICK
from fucking IRELAND on 2008-06-02 11:33 [#02212518]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker
|
|
LAZY_TITLE
|
|
Cliff Glitchard
from DEEP DOWN INSIDE on 2008-06-02 11:44 [#02212522]
Points: 4158 Status: Lurker
|
|
Page Not Found
The page you are looking for does not exist at this URL. You can:
* search the site, using the search field or Google * browse through the archives * start at the beginning
|
|
PORICK
from fucking IRELAND on 2008-06-02 11:46 [#02212523]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker
|
|
sorry
v2
|
|
jackeroffer
from Aruba on 2008-06-02 11:46 [#02212524]
Points: 1038 Status: Lurker
|
|
scare tactics, that's all this is.
i wouldnt be surprised if anyone arrested got off with no charges
|
|
freqy
on 2008-06-02 12:06 [#02212527]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
anyone got an onik invite please ? even tho i dont know what it is
|
|
freqy
on 2008-06-02 12:10 [#02212529]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
so hang on since when was an mp3 illegal.?
whats an ipod then? a crack pipe?
|
|
Ego
from Antwerpen (Belgium) on 2008-06-02 12:26 [#02212533]
Points: 168 Status: Lurker
|
|
"Suspects were taken to their local police station for questioning and required to provide DNA samples and fingerprints."
Haha.
|
|
vlari
from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2008-06-02 12:33 [#02212536]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular
|
|
what they really ought to do was take dna and ffp
|
|
Brisk
from selling smack at the orphanage on 2008-06-02 12:39 [#02212539]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker
|
|
in other news, mp3 freeleech on what.fm is go!
|
|
obara
from Utrecht on 2008-06-02 13:04 [#02212545]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular
|
|
scare tactics indeed
|
|
hedphukkerr
from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-06-02 13:17 [#02212549]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular
|
|
yeah, they better get on that oink thing - i hear it's getting kinda big on the interwebs.
|
|
BoxBob-K23
from Finland on 2008-06-02 13:21 [#02212552]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular
|
|
oh no, oink oink
|
|
BoxBob-K23
from Finland on 2008-06-02 13:23 [#02212553]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular
|
|
lol @ "Conspiracy to Defraud the Music Industry", sounds so serious. what a load of bull.
|
|
larn
from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2008-06-02 14:31 [#02212574]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
i suppose that's one good thing about leeching, you wont get caught
|
|
gerbik
on 2008-06-02 14:44 [#02212579]
Points: 441 Status: Lurker
|
|
all pre-release uploaders
|
|
OK
on 2008-06-02 20:25 [#02212680]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker
|
|
pigs
|
|
Quaristice
on 2008-06-03 01:31 [#02212719]
Points: 521 Status: Regular
|
|
is there a reason why the police don't go after soulseek? surely that is much bigger than oink ever was?
|
|
Gwely Mernans
from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2008-06-03 01:55 [#02212720]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to Quaristice: #02212719
|
|
good question. why are things like slsk not under scrutiny? It's great that it's not but it makes you wonder.
The only thing they can do is target a particular site/p2p network and hope it instills fear towards others?
I'd say the internet has already won. It's nothing but scare tactics.
|
|
hedphukkerr
from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-06-03 02:05 [#02212723]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #02212720
|
|
because slsk doesn't have nearly as much traffic as the big torrent sites. slsk may seem big, but its mainly underground and rare music which is traded there, neither of which are of particular interest to the companies which will ever bother with busting p2p users.
|
|
PS
on 2008-06-03 02:17 [#02212728]
Points: 1876 Status: Lurker | Followup to hedphukkerr: #02212723
|
|
Yeah, that sounds about right.. How did your set go?
|
|
BoxBob-K23
from Finland on 2008-06-03 16:19 [#02212901]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular | Followup to hedphukkerr: #02212723
|
|
yea, I think they are mainly concerned with the 1% of albums that their revenues depend on. Individual tracks are not that destructive for their business model. But of course it's still an uphill battle, to say the least. I guess they haven't considered adapting to the changing environment instead of fighting windmills.
|
|
Sano
on 2008-06-03 17:04 [#02212910]
Points: 2502 Status: Lurker
|
|
They should go after ISP's not the users, maybe capping the bandwidth of all P2P connections, definitely blocking access to piratebay and all other torrents sites that link to pirated files... something along those lines.
|
|
Sano
on 2008-06-03 17:05 [#02212911]
Points: 2502 Status: Lurker | Followup to Sano: #02212910
|
|
ISP's and also closing sites that link/host pirated files.
|
|
larn
from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2008-06-03 17:29 [#02212918]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
yes i agree.
i don't want to get bummed in prison for downloading music, i hope they don't come for me
|
|
jackeroffer
from Aruba on 2008-06-03 17:58 [#02212924]
Points: 1038 Status: Lurker
|
|
sano thats a terrible idea, isps are already doing that here to all P2P traffic regardless if it is illegal or not.
banning or capping a file transfer protocol just because its being used for illegal purposes is ludicrous
|
|
PORICK
from fucking IRELAND on 2008-06-03 18:01 [#02212926]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker
|
|
Sano, you dolt.
|
|
freqy
on 2008-06-03 18:08 [#02212930]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
now im classed like a drug user. im getting high off music . and for this they wanna send me and my pretty little botty to prison.
|
|
hedphukkerr
from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-06-03 18:33 [#02212940]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular
|
|
what sano, never heard of fucking net neutrality?
once you give isps the right to limit access to certain sites, they have the ability to block access to ANY site, because really, who is going to keep an eye on them?
just look at the great firewall of china - with your philosophy, thats where we'd be headed.
|
|
Messageboard index
|