|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2008-01-11 17:23 [#02162631]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
LAZY_TITLE
|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2008-01-11 17:24 [#02162632]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
Day of the Jackal....... Another great old film
|
|
Rook
from United States on 2008-01-11 17:28 [#02162635]
Points: 179 Status: Lurker
|
|
Good film. It is not nearly as high a caliber as the first Godfather or the first Apocalypse Now though.
Certain parts weakened the characters.
|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2008-01-11 17:57 [#02162641]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
The conversation is like one big ambient album.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-01-11 18:12 [#02162644]
Points: 21444 Status: Lurker
|
|
I think i saw the conversation and turned it off after 6 minutes.
|
|
pigster
from melbs on 2008-01-11 18:28 [#02162648]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker
|
|
wiki -> As of September 2007, Francis Ford Coppola will produce a remake of this movie with Paramount Pictures. The script will be written by screenwriter Stuart Beattie. This new version is set for release in 2009, incorporating post-9/11 paranoia instead of personal demons. Mikael Hofstrom will direct the remake.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2008-01-11 18:37 [#02162649]
Points: 24587 Status: Lurker | Followup to pigster: #02162648
|
|
sign o' the times.
|
|
glasse
from Harrisburg (United States) on 2008-01-12 08:29 [#02162815]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
I had to check and see if this was referring to the movie or the Cabaret Voltaire album.
|
|
mimi
on 2008-01-12 08:41 [#02162818]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular
|
|
i hate remakes, why would they remake it?
|
|
metabaron
on 2008-01-12 08:47 [#02162821]
Points: 28 Status: Regular
|
|
a wicked film..... not too pleased about this remake...
|
|
pigster
from melbs on 2008-01-12 08:51 [#02162825]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker
|
|
it's weird that francis ford coppola is behind it. i thought remakes was just business men forking in some easy cash..
|
|
retape
from http://retape.net (Norway) on 2008-01-12 10:22 [#02162903]
Points: 2355 Status: Lurker
|
|
A Conversation
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2008-01-12 10:26 [#02162906]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to pigster: #02162825 | Show recordbag
|
|
people change, maybe he cares more about the money than he used to?
|
|
hedphukkerr
from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-01-12 10:51 [#02162931]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular
|
|
classic film. really uncomfortable.
suck about the remake though, im sure it will be awful.
at least fear and paranoia of our post-9/11 gov't have become commonplace and accepted in american pop culture now.
then again, maybe if they keep it in pop culture it will all seem like fantasy...
|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2008-01-13 18:46 [#02163394]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
The original was made back when you needed an attention span to watch films.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2008-01-14 07:16 [#02163471]
Points: 24587 Status: Lurker
|
|
Hm, there are still plenty of films requiring attention spans, they've just mainly slipped back out of the main stream.
|
|
dariusgriffin
from cool on 2008-01-14 07:18 [#02163473]
Points: 12412 Status: Lurker
|
|
Remakes can be good and are not always about money.
|
|
Messageboard index
|