[production] time limit on making tracks | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 54 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2609378
Today 12
Topics 127255
  
 
Messageboard index
[production] time limit on making tracks
 

offline thecrimsonguard from ∞ (United States) on 2007-11-28 09:22 [#02148545]
Points: 1801 Status: Lurker



I've fallen into a bad habit of trying to make my own music
and getting bogged down in the mixing effects etc. I have a
ton of unfinished tracks that i would like to complete, but
once i start working on them again i hear all of the things
that frustrated me about them and just try to start over
from scratch and end up with something different and equally
f*cked up on its own. The effects are all over the place,
its just a muddled mess.

then there are the pluggins that i start messing around
with. i can spend hours tweaking the sounds from the vsti
softsynths and lose focus.

i was just curious about how you guys work, like your work
flow and studio set up. if there are any resources for
mixing/mastering that you'd suggest checking out...

Right now i have sequencers and audio editors pretty much
computer only no external input (renoise, ableton 5 (i know
they're up to 7 or will be soon), fruity loops 5, adobe
audition 2). although i would like to get a mixer and audio
interface & studio monitors for my computers. any
suggestions/studio pics would be great.


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2007-11-28 09:26 [#02148546]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



I think it's better to make tunes with another person, that
way you're sort of under pressure to produce something, but
at the same time there's quality control as well. You have
to find someone with similar tastes though, obviously.


 

offline thecrimsonguard from ∞ (United States) on 2007-11-28 09:40 [#02148549]
Points: 1801 Status: Lurker



thats one of the problems where i live. i've only met 2
people that knew of lets say Aphex Twin. One of them
thinking Richard was a full 5 member metal band, and the
other person was into his music, but wasn't interested in
producing music or even having a clue how to or wanting to.
And the majority of people around here consider anything i
listen to as techno.

it probably wouldn't hurt to get out more though i reckon


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-11-28 17:28 [#02148658]
Points: 24571 Status: Regular



I sit down and write music, but my music isn't effects
driven.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-11-28 17:58 [#02148662]
Points: 21386 Status: Regular



I need to quit pretty much all pointless memetically
replicated behavior that is easy and just focus on
programming/algorithms. The vast majority of music making
behavior nowadays is a time wasting mind disease like
religion.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-11-28 18:16 [#02148663]
Points: 24571 Status: Regular | Followup to w M w: #02148662



Are you really in London?


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-11-29 03:17 [#02148694]
Points: 21386 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #02148663



I don't know, but reading this is hilarious and
the closest I've come to actually having a girlfriend.
Actually that picture on the top left is the first time I've
even seen a girl.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-11-29 03:35 [#02148696]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #02148694 | Show recordbag



What about that time when we...?


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-11-29 03:47 [#02148697]
Points: 21386 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02148696



Please try to refrain from posting off topic.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2007-11-29 10:11 [#02148723]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to w M w: #02148694 | Show recordbag



Haha, that page is great.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-11-29 14:26 [#02148787]
Points: 21386 Status: Regular | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02148723



"
So, Margret and I were having an argument (you'd think I'd
have a shortcut key for that sentence by now, wouldn't
you?). I can't remember what we were arguing about, but that
doesn't matter here because in today's lesson we're focusing
on style, not content. Say we were arguing about, oh,
lettuce (even if we weren't, it's surely only a matter of
time):
Margret: You haven't washed all the lettuce.
Mil: I've washed the bits I'm going to eat.
Margret: And left the rest for me to wash.
Mil: If you wash it all, it goes off quicker.
Margret: So, we'll eat it quicker, then.
Mil: I don't want to eat it quicker.
Margret: But I do.
Mil: Then wash it yourself if you're so bloody desperate to
gorge on lettuce. What am I? Your official Lettuce Washer?
Margret: My last boyfriend was taller than you.
Etc.
Fairly standard stuff, clearly, but what you need to realise
is something that I can't get across on the page. It's that,
as the exchanges switched backwards and forwards between us,
there was a kind of bidding war going on with the pitch.
It's not just that each one of us upped the volume a little
for our turn, but that we also changed the tone by raising
our voices so that our reply was about a fifth higher than
the one that the other person had just used. It was like two
Mariah Careys facing off - pretty quickly, we were having an
argument that only dogs could hear.
I've noticed that this often happens, and I reckon Margret
secretly initiates it as a ploy. She raises her pitch,
subconsciously luring me to respond. It's tactical. She
knows it increases her chances of winning the argument
because - when I come to deliver the final, logical coup de
grace with great imperiousness and gravitas - I discover I'm
doing so in the voice of Jimmy Somerville.
"


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2007-11-29 14:35 [#02148792]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to w M w: #02148787 | Show recordbag



hahaha, there're so many comedic gems nestled within that
webpage.

"
Salesgit: 'Excuse me. Have you had an accident within the
last three years?'
Me: 'No. I always look like this.'

I mean, it's basically someone coming up to you and saying,
'Hi - you appear to be the result of some terrible
catastrophe,' isn't it? Maybe I should reassess my haircut
or something.
"


 


Messageboard index