|
|
fixer
from concepción (Chile) on 2002-10-11 22:37 [#00401009]
Points: 18 Status: Regular
|
|
almost every song i downloaded was damaged. i know there are some programs out ther, but do they really work. where can i get them.
|
|
Ctrl Alt Del
from Ft. Worth (United States) on 2002-10-11 22:43 [#00401013]
Points: 2190 Status: Lurker
|
|
your the fixer, aint you supposed to know these things?!?
|
|
fixer
from concepción (Chile) on 2002-10-11 22:51 [#00401023]
Points: 18 Status: Regular
|
|
its a rethoric question i fix broken things, no mp3
|
|
titsworth
from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-11 22:52 [#00401024]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker
|
|
how do you mean "broken" mp3's?
|
|
Inverted Whale
from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-10-11 23:01 [#00401033]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker
|
|
No, whether it's broken sound quality or bad mp3 structure(CRC error or whatnot).
Well, there's a few specific errors that can usually be fixed, like bad Xing VBR frames, but those aren't common.
I hope someone can prove me wrong though, as I have a couple of these myself ...
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2002-10-11 23:24 [#00401053]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
important public service message
MP3 compression the way it is usually done is ass for electronic music.
I just got loop-finding-jazz-records on CD after having the 192k MP3s for a while and the difference is astonishing - it's like hearing the music for the first time.
I guess if more people used -r3mix it would not offend the ear so.
|
|
titsworth
from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-11 23:25 [#00401054]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00401053
|
|
glad you noticed mp3's sound like shit. sorry to say that a lot of people don't notice the difference...
|
|
Inverted Whale
from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-10-11 23:31 [#00401056]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker
|
|
A lot of people listen to them on crappy headphones with computer fans blowing in the background. No wonder ...
fleetmouse, the --r3mix LAME encoder preset is essentially obsolete, people should probably start using
--alt-preset standard
as a replacement or
--alt-preset cbr 192 (or higher)
if you have to have CBR for whatever reason.
|
|
titsworth
from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-11 23:33 [#00401058]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker
|
|
i use blade to make my mp3's, suits me fine.
|
|
Inverted Whale
from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-10-11 23:43 [#00401066]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00401058
|
|
Consider using LAME, Bladeenc has quite a few bugs, especially at 128 KBps.
The author has stopped working on it as well, not a great sign of support.
|
|
princo
from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-10-11 23:47 [#00401069]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker
|
|
Alot of people dont have a decent set of speakers to notice any difference in MP3 bitrates..
|
|
princo
from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-10-11 23:48 [#00401071]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker | Followup to Inverted Whale: #00401066
|
|
Yep, LAME is my choice of MP3 encoding!
|
|
titsworth
from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-12 00:33 [#00401088]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker
|
|
yea, the ripper i use has lame too, i've used it but i generally use blade. i don't really make mp3's @ 128, i make 'em at 192 unless the source files are in mono or low stereo quality.
|
|
Duble0Syx
from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2002-10-12 01:42 [#00401111]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker
|
|
I rip all my new music into mp3pro format and at 100% vbr. The average bitrate is 128kps and far exceeds that of a normal mp3 of that bitrate...
|
|
Paco
from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2002-10-12 06:29 [#00401175]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker
|
|
When I heard BOC's 'Amo Bishop Roden' on CD for the first time, it was like a new track. The heavy bass had completely dissapeared in my mp3.
-P
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2002-10-12 07:57 [#00401189]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
Inverted Whale, tell me more about alt-preset standard, the man page isn't especially descriptive! Are extreme and insane better than standard in terms of sound quality?
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2002-10-12 07:58 [#00401190]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
Ah. Nevermind. I'm an idjit.
|
|
Centurix
from Brisbane (Australia) on 2002-10-12 07:59 [#00401191]
Points: 116 Status: Lurker | Followup to fixer: #00401009
|
|
Maybe the mp3 is cooked. Try Uncook95 on the file and see if it fixes it...
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2002-10-12 09:20 [#00401213]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
Just wanted to stress that loop-finding-jazz-records is un-fucking-believably good. What a great disk. Like, half of the music must have been seen as noise by the mp3 encoder and thrown out.
It plays kinda like a cross between Pole and Oval, but far more musically satisfying than either. It has Pole's dubby echoes and Oval's bittersweet snatches of stolen melody, arranged less haphazardly. More craft. Lots of clever detail at the threshold of audibility, sounds like fabric swishing (which is probably samples of needles playing in "empty" grooves), eensy weensy little pops and clusters of static buffed and placed with as much loving detail as a Squarepusher turnaround.
|
|
Inverted Whale
from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-10-12 09:33 [#00401221]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00401189
|
|
You've already figured this out, but extreme and insane are both better quality than standard.
I can only hear the difference between standard and extreme on about a half dozen tracks (like autechre - second bad vilbel) so I always use standard since it's a good bit smaller. insane is probably the best quality you'll get out of a standard mp3, but the filesize is huge.
If you're curious about this sort of stuff, the LAME developers hang out on audio-illumination.org/forums/
|
|
death-pengwin
from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2002-10-12 10:06 [#00401247]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker
|
|
i find a huge difference between mp3 and vinyl. the commpression in mp3s ruin everything in my opinion. try downloading some autechre you have on vinyl allready. i just sounds like shit (the mp3) and all the higher frequencies sound distorted and squechy and the sort
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2002-10-12 10:12 [#00401250]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Inverted Whale: #00401221
|
|
"I can only hear the difference between standard and extreme on about a half dozen tracks (like autechre - second bad vilbel)
Then that's what I'll use as a test, that and maybe some Chiastic. Does standard use the ~19kHz cutoff like Lame?
|
|
Inverted Whale
from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-10-12 11:08 [#00401287]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker
|
|
Yes, the --alt-preset standard lowpass is 19kHz. extreme is 19500 Hz and insane is 20500 Hz.
|
|
Messageboard index
|