Iraq War - Thought for the Day | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 374 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614224
Today 6
Topics 127549
  
 
Messageboard index
Iraq War - Thought for the Day
 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-09-08 10:48 [#00383933]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



I've noticed that there is a lot of opposition to whether
or not we should attack Iraq again....and from what I see on
the news lately it's gonna happen I think....

Is there so much opposition here on the message board
because al lot of you are of the age of consciption, single
males 18-23?? Just wondering!


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-09-08 10:56 [#00383934]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



....I think I should be OK.

I hope.

*looks nervous*


 

offline smokehammer from Saigon (Vietnam) on 2002-09-08 11:05 [#00383939]
Points: 1463 Status: Lurker



the opposition is not limited to this mb,

74% of the UK public on Channel 4's debate last night were
opposed and even more beleive parliament should be recalled
before any action is taken.

Its one thing elected leaders disregarding the will of the
people ,

But its even worse when elected leaders are also
disregarded

It seems that western democrasy remains merely a nice idea
.....



 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-09-08 11:09 [#00383941]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to smokehammer: #00383939



How old are you though, and would you go?


 

offline smokehammer from Saigon (Vietnam) on 2002-09-08 11:12 [#00383943]
Points: 1463 Status: Lurker



27 ; and I'm British , so there are no call-ups in modern
warfare in our country.

But, no I wouldn't anyway. I don't beleive in dying for an
unjust cause, and nobody else should have to either


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-09-08 11:17 [#00383947]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to smokehammer: #00383943



Conscription papers were drawn up last time back in '91 - I
remember it, 'cos we were all crapping ourselves in college,
hehehehe!


 

offline MistahKurtz from Paris (France) on 2002-09-08 11:23 [#00383952]
Points: 327 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00383933



Lol, yeah but at least where I come from military service
doesn't exist any longer and i doubt they are going to send
the tender youth over to fight along side the professional
army... Our oppostion does not stem from fear but from
reason...


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-09-08 11:26 [#00383954]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to MistahKurtz: #00383952



Military service doesn't exist here either, but do you not
think that (and you'll think that this is a terrible thing
to say) that our governments would conscript young males, as
not to 'waste' trained experienced military personel?


 

offline smokehammer from Saigon (Vietnam) on 2002-09-08 11:27 [#00383955]
Points: 1463 Status: Lurker



:)

but only 57 allied troops died in that "War"

so theoretically we would have "Won" it with only 58 troops.


Shit, we could have sent a whole army over on a National
Express coach and still won !

imagine that 58th guy, the survivor ; driving the coach
home through the streets of London through clouds of
ticker- tape with a big-band fanfare....

"It was me, yup, I did it . Thank you. "

waves.salutes.acclamation. :D




 

offline MistahKurtz from Paris (France) on 2002-09-08 11:27 [#00383956]
Points: 327 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00383954



No way, that would lead to a Vietnam War 60s style
student/young male's revolt!


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-09-08 11:30 [#00383957]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to MistahKurtz: #00383956



I do not know much about the Vietnam war sorry, so I cannot
comment....

:(


 

offline dmise from Melbourne (Australia) on 2002-09-08 11:36 [#00383958]
Points: 635 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00383933



I don't think we should attack iraq. I just think of all
those poor people who have died in iraq because of economic
sanctions and many more will die if there is an attack.

I want weapons inspection to resume to make sure that there
aren't any weapons of mass destruction.

I do not agree with sadam though he seems to be an evil man
but I would prefer to see an uprising by the people in Iraq
to topple him rather than a lot of people dying in an attack
by the US or the UN.


 

offline mccabe from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2002-09-08 11:38 [#00383961]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00383957



Well you`ll be safe anyway,arn`t you around 30?
I would probably be safe from conscription because I work in
the care field [people still need 24 hour care].I still
oppose it though.


 

offline dan7250 from Osaka (Japan) on 2002-09-08 11:43 [#00383962]
Points: 598 Status: Lurker



in 1996 alone 500,000 children died in iraq due to US
economic sanctions.

i got that figure from an article i read by arundhati roy.
and yes, i would trust her writing. i think she is very
reputable.

also with conscription.... there is no way i would ever go
to war. there is no way i would ever fight for my country,
i'd go to jail first.

unfortunately the australian prime minister (john howard)
has his cock lodged firmly up george bushes arsehole......
so there is little chance of australia shaking this one off.


 

offline MistahKurtz from Paris (France) on 2002-09-08 11:47 [#00383965]
Points: 327 Status: Lurker | Followup to dan7250: #00383962



Nice expression, very graphic...


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-09-08 11:53 [#00383966]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I reckon they'd have a revolt on their hands if they tried
to enlist people for this war...

It's just too unpopular and the govt wouldn't dare....



 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-09-08 11:56 [#00383968]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to jand: #00383966



You think?


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-09-08 11:56 [#00383969]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker | Followup to MistahKurtz: #00383965



He's not wrong though!


 

offline dan7250 from Osaka (Japan) on 2002-09-08 11:57 [#00383970]
Points: 598 Status: Lurker



i think a call for conscription in australia would cause a
huge uproar. big problems for the gov!


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-09-08 12:25 [#00383978]
Points: 24593 Status: Regular



I saw on the news, one of the main US arms inspectors to
Iraq, saying there was absolutely no proof that Iraq has
weapons of mass destruction &tc...


 

offline mccabe from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2002-09-08 13:17 [#00383991]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00383978



so you believe in the news now marlowe.......tsk,tsk.


 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2002-09-08 13:22 [#00383993]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



If there was proof, I think Bush would be shoving that proof
in your face everyday until the attacks began.

There is more to this than the Taliban/weapons of mass
destruction issue.

When Iraq invaded Kuwait, Iraq had the highest living
standards in the Gulf area. Saddam was investing large
amounts of money on his people. Now, the US doesn't like
this because it's not what a country is supposed to do. The
US interests are in foreign investments (Iraq has oil).

That's one of the reasons the allied dropped so many bombs
on Iraq in 1991. To make sure they were bombed back to the
stone-age. A similar thing happened under Reagan, when the
US created and funded the Contras to disrupt the Sandanista
government in Nicaragua. They also invested large amounts of
money on their population.

The 1998 attacks on Iraq were partly or wholly excused with
Saddam's attack on the Kurds in 1988.

1988 was the peak year of military aid from the US to Iraq.

Don't even for a second think there are noble causes behind
this. It's all about the money.

-P


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-09-08 14:32 [#00384013]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



Here's something else to think about, if you were Sadam
Hussein, why shouldn't you be able to have Nuclear
capability, and be able to protect yourself?


 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2002-09-08 14:50 [#00384028]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



He is not mentally fit to rule a pile of shit, much less a
country with nukes?

-P


 

offline nacmat on 2002-09-08 15:19 [#00384076]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



stop fucking war!!!
stop ruling the world for money... usa get out of our lifes


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-09-08 15:32 [#00384087]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #00384076



Hello my friend, how are you?


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2002-09-08 18:07 [#00384159]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



you have to tell that to President (I would back stab my own
mother for oil, drugs and money.... and my partner dick
cheney is a CEO who fucked over his own company, and I look
like a retarded monkey cowboy) Bush himself


 

offline Peter File from the future!!! Ooooh chase me! on 2002-09-08 18:20 [#00384172]
Points: 2020 Status: Lurker | Followup to smokehammer: #00383955



Heh. Way to rip off Bill Hicks :)


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2002-09-08 18:27 [#00384181]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



Who is Bill Hicks ?


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2002-09-08 18:30 [#00384189]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



:)


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-09-08 18:34 [#00384191]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



In the history of the US, nearly everytime a war has occured
near the end of the presidents term, that presidents party
has gone on to win the next election. Bush has some reasons
to go to war that aren't exactly in the best interests of
his people.
Lets just say that if the elections in November favor the
republicans senate, we're screwed.


 

offline Cabbog from Chautauqua (United States) on 2002-09-08 18:39 [#00384194]
Points: 2294 Status: Regular



Like Paco said, Saddam is not fit to rule a pile of shit
much less a country with nuclear weapons. We're talking
about an extremely paranoid man here who, on whim,
personally executes those that would disagree and oppose his
views. A man who suffers from extreme dellusions of
grandeur.. It seems to me that the United Nations has never
had the balls to do anything. Possibly because of the
proximity issue, I really don't know...
But why would he suddenly decide that the conditions of the
treaty we signed were no longer valid? Doesn't that make
anyone else a little suspicious? Instead of hearing "stop
fucking war!!! stop ruling the world for money... usa get
out of our lifes" I'd like to hear some intelligent
alternatives to what we should do. I mean, it's been what?
4 years now since we've been able to investigate? This is a
serious issue.


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-09-08 18:43 [#00384196]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to Cabbog: #00384194



oh you're right there. it is serious and we need to find
alternatives to bombing the shit out of a country.
As you said, Saddam has a country to rule. He may be
paranoid, but i doubt he would attack the US unprovoked,
knowing that we would literally destroy Iraq. Hes still a
danger though, and the country obviously needs someone else
to rule.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-09-08 18:50 [#00384202]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cabbog: #00384194



Drop the economic sanctions and send in the
weaponsinspectors. Saddam agrees with it.


 

offline thanksomuch from planet claire on 2002-09-08 18:54 [#00384206]
Points: 544 Status: Regular



the usa needs to back the fuck off.... i can just imagine
what the reaction world wide would be if we tried to take on
another little war... the US is a bully...


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-09-08 18:57 [#00384209]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to thanksomuch: #00384206



well, the reaction is already pretty bad.


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2002-09-08 19:04 [#00384216]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



There is no intellegent thing to do when circumstances have
led people thinking about war. A smart thing to do would be
to start an underground anti Iraq opposition rebel force
(Believe it or not... there are people who live in iraq who
oppose and want sadam out of power. But the problem is, if
anybody gets caught holding a meeting, or even speaking of
opposing saddam they will be executed) Smart people in
washington have spoken of this briefly, but people were too
busy looking at the granduer of all the political gain from
starting, and winning a war, part of their bullshit anti
terror campaign from 9/11. All from which started and came
from the CIA firebombing all afgan farmland and trying to
gain oil. () this link has information and goverment
documents stating that President Bush knew that there were
going to be attacks on a large scale agianst the U.S....
sorry getting off topic.

I think the only viable option IMO is to give help and
assistance (firearms, training) to the Iraq underground
rebels. Its Iraqs problem, but all Bush wants to do is start
something his daddy couldnt finish, to gain oil control over
Iraq. Nuclear war is bad illbiet, but when U.S intellegence
speaks of ACTUAL nuclear launching capabilities (ie.... when
he is housing silos and has launch technologies that are
capable of launing rockets on a world scale) is the day we
should intervien. Not when we say..... In two years from
now... he will have these capabilities.... The middle east
has all types of problems, they need to figuere them out on
their own. What sucks about this, is that Mr. Bush is
fucking up US world relations so bad... everyone things we
are oil hungry capitalist monkies just like him. And we have
Iraq calling us the GREAT SATAN. Great. So we are in a
situation were its, your damned if you do... and your damned
if you dont. The Bush family have fucked us over the US
people in soo many ways. If you dont believe me check out
the patroit act. It takes away amendment librities. If they
think you are related to terrorists i


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2002-09-08 19:05 [#00384217]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



in any way.... you can be convicted without trial, people
can search your home without any search warrents, they take
away your freedom of speech.... its really scary. It makes
me wonder how long it is before people in the US actually
start getting into politics and start fighting the good
fight. Because if people dont get invovled soon.... there is
not going to be much of a (United) States left after these
capitolist swine fuck it for what its worth.


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2002-09-08 19:16 [#00384224]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



here is a link ....

www.fromthewilderness.com



 

offline Cabbog from Chautauqua (United States) on 2002-09-09 04:01 [#00384682]
Points: 2294 Status: Regular



Tell me about the economic sanctions, I'm not quite sure I
know about that. I did a brief search on google but
couldn't come up with anything comprehensive.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-09-09 08:23 [#00384870]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cabbog: #00384682



Well you're not online but you may come back so...

Basically the UN has placed sanctions on Iraq which prohibit
countries trading with Iraq. This means that the population
don't get the food, medicine, equipment etc that they need.
This was dressed up to be a humanitarian alternative to
bombing but it has already killed over 100,000 children as a
DIRECT consequence of sanctions. It is basically economic
warfare and just as, if not more, deadly than bombing (BTW
we've been bombing Iraq every week for the last 10 or so
years).

Here's a (reputable) link:

http://pilger.carlton.com/iraq/impact


 


Messageboard index