Soulseek Sharing | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 320 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614125
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Soulseek Sharing
 

offline spoonz from Edmonton, AB (Canada) on 2002-05-21 23:24 [#00228941]
Points: 3219 Status: Regular



How many files do you share on Soulseek? just outta
curiosity

i've got 1,950...


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-05-21 23:26 [#00228944]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker



Hm, another how big is your ____ thread ...

5,773


 

offline spoonz from Edmonton, AB (Canada) on 2002-05-21 23:28 [#00228946]
Points: 3219 Status: Regular | Followup to Inverted Whale: #00228944



lol...wha?!


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-21 23:29 [#00228947]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



1,399 i think....


 

offline steve from chicago on 2002-05-22 00:05 [#00228981]
Points: 1156 Status: Lurker



About 3,000.

As soon as I download something, I organize it the way I
want then pop it right back into the shared directory.


 

offline dosle from kenosha (United States) on 2002-05-22 00:08 [#00228983]
Points: 53 Status: Lurker



23,659


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-22 00:11 [#00228986]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to dosle: #00228983



................fuckin hell...............


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-05-22 00:14 [#00228988]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



er, 90....but then again, i'm on a 56 k modem-.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2002-05-22 00:19 [#00228991]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



800 or so... I think.


 

offline cre from reykjavik (Iceland) on 2002-05-22 01:02 [#00229021]
Points: 174 Status: Lurker



1431


 

offline ceiling_fan from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-22 18:19 [#00230178]
Points: 93 Status: Lurker



about fifteen-hundred (1500)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-05-22 18:20 [#00230179]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



About 1111


 

offline Sepix from Major City (Austria) on 2002-05-22 18:20 [#00230181]
Points: 3110 Status: Lurker



007


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-05-22 18:22 [#00230183]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker



about 8 inches...ah, oh, about 2,000 --- 4,000 if soulseek
will ever let me share most of my MP3s without crashing


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-05-22 18:23 [#00230185]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker



about 600 files, the bulk of it being autechre


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-05-22 18:57 [#00230213]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Couple thousand, I guess.

But somebody messaged me and told me to ''share or be
banned''... I don't think I'm sharing ANY... my settings
point to the wrong directory, because I had to move my files
a couple weeks ago. And when I try to point to the directory
I WANT to share, the thing freezes while scanning the new
directory, so I don't think I can share ANYTHING until this
stops fucking up. Hopefully a less buggy version coming up
will do the trick.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-05-22 19:01 [#00230217]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ophecks: #00230213 | Show recordbag



The funniest is when you start using a P2P program and you
don't even know how to set your shared directory. Some self
righteous fucker starts cancelling your DLs because you're
not sharing. You think to yourself, perhaps if you (and
likeminded people) let me download I might have
something to share!


 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2002-05-22 19:16 [#00230233]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



They all say that :)


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-05-22 19:26 [#00230242]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #00230213



yeah ophecks, that's exactly the same problem i've been
having


 

offline astrid-gil-botn from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-22 20:12 [#00230270]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular



i don't use it - i prefer to buy the music so that the
labels will keep putting out music - soulseek kills small
record labels and cosequently one day all we will be able to
hear is britney and steps ....also you can mix records
better - tractor is shit


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-05-22 20:20 [#00230279]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker | Followup to astrid-gil-botn: #00230270



so we should all download britney spears from now on?


 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2002-05-22 20:22 [#00230281]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



It's a start.


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-05-22 20:22 [#00230282]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker | Followup to astrid-gil-botn: #00230270



I think it's way too early to tell if "soulseek kills small
record labels."

Baen Books (small publisher of sci-fi/fantasy) has been
experimenting with an "open library" concept and found that
it actually increased sales. Go figure.


 

offline Sepix from Major City (Austria) on 2002-05-22 20:25 [#00230283]
Points: 3110 Status: Lurker



all the poll results say that p2p helps music in general.
of course only good ones cause the bad ones are losing like
they always did 8:)


 

offline nir on 2002-05-22 21:59 [#00230430]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



a very interesting discussion/poll about the subject can be
found here. to summarize it, the crushing majority
of users buy as much or more music since they've started
using soulseek.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-05-22 22:02 [#00230439]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



If it wasn't for Napster, RDJ (well, the record company,
anyway), wouldn't have got the 30 bucks I spent on Drukqs.


 

offline hungrig from Sweden on 2002-05-22 22:24 [#00230503]
Points: 692 Status: Lurker



soulseek is not working for me.. so i dunno... i use
audiogalaxy instead... works fine.


 

offline astrid-gil-botn from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-22 23:51 [#00230682]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular



well cd sales in germany have gone down by 70% since file
sharing - that's overall - pretty fucked eh?
i think it's bollocks that more people buy more music after
downloading it - you lot were just comparing your vast mp3
collections - surley you don't have that many cd's and
records??
Down load britney spears if you want - what i'm saying is i
don't use soulseek cos i t does actually have a detrimental
effect on the sale of records and will lead to loads of
small labels closing


 

offline Sepix from Major City (Austria) on 2002-05-22 23:58 [#00230698]
Points: 3110 Status: Lurker



nononono; i don`t believe !
cd selling has IMPROVED with p2p !

of course there are fuckers around who are not interested in
buyin,
but i am SURE they didn`t before p2p and they will not even
if those networks go down !

for me - i find all those great releases before the oficial
date !

when they are i out i buy them !!!
(like i did 23 times only with afx cds ;))


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2002-05-23 01:04 [#00230778]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



Eh, you know what Im downloading one Album per day whit my
shitty ISDN connection, I couldnt even afford all the stuff
Im downloading, and most of it are vinyl rips anyway ! Of
course I buy at least 2-3 Albums a month.


 

offline nir on 2002-05-23 02:35 [#00230909]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



the situation in the genre we're dealing with isn't the same
as that overall. most music sold anywhere is music that's in
the mainstream, made by manufactured artists and bands or
just extremely well-selling ones. people who are interested
in that kind of music are usually just that, interested in
the music and nothing beyond. they don't feel any real
obligation to the artist. in our genre of fairly obscure
electronic music, there is much more of a loyalty to the
artists producing it, since fans realize they're obviously
not doing anywhere as well as mainstream artists, and
additionally because electronic music is a personal, more
intimate creation. but even ignoring that, the value in
sharing electronic music lies in the exposure it awards
something that so direly needs it. as a self-proclaimed fan,
I'm amazed by the numbers of good artists in the genre I
discover on a regular basis. and file sharing is the only
reason I became a fan in the first place (after to a batch
of randomly downloaded aphex twin mp3s, bucephalus bouncing
ball did me in :). pointing out that people have way more
mp3 albums than CDs is a moot point. I have about 600 albums
in mp3 format and about 80 albums that I actually bought.
forget that I'd never own any of those 80 CDs if it wasn't
for file-sharing, but the reason I have so many more mp3
albums isn't because I don't want to pay for them, it's
because I'm going through a constant process of
experimenting and appraising them. if I decide I don't like
something, I delete it. if I do, I buy it. then again there
are people who don't even have the option of buying albums
simply because they have no money. those people tend to
build their familiarity with the genre and its artists until
such a point where they are capable of paying for albums and
concerts. the day may come when the music we're into is so
much more popular than it is today that those 30% of lost
sales will actually have anything to do with it. until then,
electronic music can only benefit from being shared thr


 

offline nir on 2002-05-23 02:36 [#00230911]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



through programs like soulseek.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-05-23 02:54 [#00230919]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



its all too late isn't it?
im gonna d/l everything i can get my theivin' hands on


 

offline windowlicker from Nashvegas on 2002-05-23 07:00 [#00231156]
Points: 565 Status: Lurker



about 12,000 (80 gigs worth)


 


Messageboard index