piracy and non-mainstream music | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 254 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614354
Today 0
Topics 127559
  
 
Messageboard index
piracy and non-mainstream music
 

offline Clic on 2003-01-07 13:23 [#00505425]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular



I've got a 56k, so I can't download entire albums, even if I
cared to.

I feel like I've kind of slept through this whole file
sharing thing. I mean, I'll download a track here and there,
but I am so used to buying the real thing, I just don't feel
like messing with all that.

Support and album art is good.


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-01-07 13:31 [#00505442]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



"over 100 cd's wouldn't have been sold without
napster.
"

yeah well... fair enough :-) Like i said in my previous post
(before the last one)... nobody (i imagine not even the
industry!) has a problem with people using filesharing to
discover new music.

What they (and i) don't like is people who like yourself
discovered a 100 cd's worth of music... but then decided to
just download the songs and burn themselves a 100 cd-r's...
that's just lame!


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-01-07 13:36 [#00505449]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



"I feel worse about paying $17.99 for a CD that cost 50
cents to manufacture and something like $2.00 goes to the
artist.
"

Yeah... and ofcourse recording-studio's are all run by such
music-lovers that they allow the artists to use their
equipment for free. Also the pressingplants that make the
inlays and artwork cost absolutely nothing. And promoting a
cd (advertising on tv, in magazines, making videoclips) also
doesn't need to be paid for...

:-/

Wake up and smell the coffee...

You all make it sound like people who work at
recordcompanies do nothing more than sit at desks and smoke
cigars.


 

offline Clic on 2003-01-07 13:40 [#00505452]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular | Followup to surrounded: #00505449



Word.


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-01-07 13:46 [#00505457]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



"I think if an artist can find a large enough audience he
ought to be able to find a way to extract money from them in
return for listening pleasure.
"

And don't you think that's how recordcompanies started in
the first place? Some artist probably knew "somebody" who
helped them set up things. And after that went succesful
"somebody" thought he might also help other artists get
their music heard. When things got too succesfull he hired
more people to do all the work... et voila... the world's
first recordcompany ;-)

"I think the answer lies in making music files available
that are so easy to obtain and so high quality that it's
actually cheaper and easier to give the artist a few bucks
for them through paypal rather than hunting around on Kazaa
or whatnot for incomplete,
shitty sounding files.
"

Well... if that's your dream (personally i really really
really really like the fysical format of an entire
album (not just loose tracks, but a carefully composed
album) with proper artwork etc. I also think music-stores
are the most fun places on earth... i wouldn't want to miss
them)... but okay... if that is your dream you can wait for
that. But why not keep buying music while you wait? :-)

I would have some sort of respect for your views if it were
purely idealistic... but i can't help but feel that
basically you just don't feel like paying for your music.

If you're searching for other ways of getting music from the
artist to the audience then that's fine with me. Go for it!
Write letters, set up something yourself, fight for it!

But you can't just sit behind your computer, steal music
from the internet, and write on some swedish messageboard
about how you wish things would be ;-)

I'm sorry if that sounded a bit harsh... nothing personal
:-) But that's just the way i see it.

Also... what happened to the ellen feiss-avatar? I miss her
:-p


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-01-07 13:52 [#00505466]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to Clic: #00505425



i'm a lot like you actually. Even though i have
broadband-internet now... the thought of downloading doesn't
appeal to me (infact i don't even have soulseek installed).
Every now and then i listen to some music online (warp
offers almost their entire backcatalogue to listen to for
free on the site! Quite amazing)... but it just doesn't give
me the same feeling as going to a store and buying a cd.

I treasure my cd's... i don't care much for the stuff i
listen to online. It's nice... but just to hear what
something sounds like.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-01-07 13:54 [#00505467]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



They have a choice in life these artists. We owe them
nothing, sure I enjoy their music and I pay for it. But like
Fleetmouse said they're is only so much money from the
consumers pocket to go around to pay for records by the
likes of Aphex, Squarepusher etc. Plaid use to work while
they were doing their music, they only stopped with the
success of 'Spanners' (thats the reality).

All this ball about artists doing things directly with the
consumers, yeah thats all fine and dandy but at the end of
the day they'll never really get a huge audience. MTV and
daytime Radio 1 are the channels except it. And besides its
the old adage if people can get something for free then they
don't give a shit. Anyway most of the people on the board
are more conscious of the fact that artists struggle because
they have their own fantasies about doing they're music and
get paid for it or whatever. What you lot are taking out of
the equation is all the selling and pushing that goes on
behind the scenes (from
pr/distributors/labels/artists/retail/etc etc) which are
supposed leaches and should just do it for free. So sure as
hell it ain't as straight forward as writing a few tracks
and then suddenly everyone goes and buys them, there's a bit
more to it than that.

If you don't take some business approach or have some agenda
or plan towards your music then you might as well forget it.
People just never learn they seem to bang out the same old
arguments again and again year after year like the world
owes them a living. Christ its boring.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-01-07 14:01 [#00505475]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to surrounded: #00505457



Dude, I buy CDs. I buy lots more CDs than I did before
filesharing. Like, ten times more. Didn't you read that
post?

What I want to see is a 5 dollar download of CD quality
files, with high res artwork and liner notes. This is
cheaper than the time and effort you'd spend screwing around
with filesharing apps, looking for a guy with decent files,
hoping they're complete, hoping he doesn't cut you off...
that's if you can find them at all!

The only way artists can outcompete piracy is by being more
efficient than the pirates!

And one more time: I BUY CDS!!! I would gladly pay to
download music if it were in a CD quality format. If I find
something good I find a way to compensate the artist (right
now that means buying the physical CD, which I think is
oldfashioned). If it sucks, I delete the files.

Dude, attachment to physical music formats is so 20th
century. I'm sorry, but the world has changed. Record
companies are trying to sell horses in the jet age.

I may switch back to Ellen Feiss if Spikee Dragon keeps
getting dragon spittle all over my nice pink and white bunny
ears.


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-01-07 14:03 [#00505478]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



"They have a choice in life these artists. We owe them
nothing
"

What kind of attitude is that? :-p
You pay for your clothes, you pay for your house, you pay
for food... hell... you even pay for your dentist to torture
you once every 6 months!

But then when it comes to art... (something that for me has
enriched my life in more ways than any of the things
mentioned above... i love it! The music that i listen to has
changed my life, and i am very thankful to the artist for
making it. The same thing goes for beautiful movies, books
and paintings)... then you say: "pfff, it's their choice to
make music, why should i feel responsible?" It's a very
egoistical (sp?) view on the world imo. It is true that in
the business-sense music is worth nothing... but on another
level it's one of the most valuable things in your life
(probably especially for people like us (the boardmembers)
who all seem very passionate about it).


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-01-07 14:05 [#00505484]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



it makes me ashamed to admit i have found almost all of my
favourite artist trough warez circles. i am young, i have no
credit card and i live in periferia, so you can't really
expect me to find ANYTHING at record shops. i do buy, always
when it is possible but unfortunately shipping etc costs so
much music comes very expensive to me. so i seldom order
anything i'm not definate of being good (does that sentencd
make sense). if i'd meet richard or the fsol guys i'd say
i'm so sorry guys, that i have pirated your music, but it is
just so good and i had no chance to buy it. i know i don't
necessarily deserve the music, being poor and geographically
misplaced. but i bet they'd forgive me for at least being
able to listen.

or should i just stick to the chart music to be able to buy?
:o


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2003-01-07 14:08 [#00505488]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker | Followup to neetta: #00505484



why should you feel ashamed????
if filesharing disappeared those were the first ones who
would cry for it.


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-01-07 14:09 [#00505492]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



well, because picary is wrong you know. i just have very bad
consience of all this.


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-01-07 14:12 [#00505497]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



"And one more time: I BUY CDS!!!"

okay okay! :-p Then i guess my post wasn't aimed directly at
you... you seem to be on the "good" side of the downloaders
;-)

(and yeah, i read this thread in the afternoon, and now
again in the evening... i had forgotten about your earlier
post when i started replying).

But i'm sure there are people reading this board to whom my
post is aimed... they know who they are i'm sure ;-)

"Dude, attachment to physical music formats is so 20th
century. I'm sorry, but the world has changed.
Recordcompanies are trying to sell horses in the jet
age.
"

lol!
hm... yeah... well i fear you may be right there in a way
:-(
I don't think fysical cd's are passé just yet... but they
probably will be some time in the future.

Even today you've still got people who think everything was
better in the days that vinyl was the standard.

I imagine i will turn out alot like them ;-) Telling people
everything was better in the days when cd's were the
standard :-p

I still hope you're wrong though ;-) CD's forever! Jay!


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-01-07 14:15 [#00505503]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



did any of you actually READ the link i posted? shadow isn't
protesting mp3 downloading, but people who download albums
and don't buy them. as mickey would put it: "christ on a
cracker" you guys! he's not thumbing his nose at anyone who
can't afford $20 an album (see his comment on shady major
label record execs) or people who use mp3's as previews.

also, the reason some of you have such a hard time finding
good music in stores is cos the piracy of those of you who
burn albums instead of buying them gives the wrong message
to the aforementioned shady execs. the 1/2 of the people who
listen to the album that haven't bought it AREN'T accounted
for with the label. fuck artist profits, we're talking about
distribution and label politicking. without sales labels
have no reason to pay for the recording of an artist's next
album, much less release the muthafucka (especially to a
wide audience like around the world to finland or
australia). it's a vicious cycle but until music isn't
controlled by a profit-oriented industry, we have to play
the game (assuming you want new music to be released). i
mean it's because of people like a lot of you that some of
my favorite artists (pharoahe monch, coil, black thought of
the roots, mos def, del, rza, dj krush, esthero, j-live,
telefon tel aviv) have fucking unreleased albums.

also, in the link y'all ignored, he once again stated how
happy he was that he didn't release a "sequel" to
endtroducing (i don't think anyone would contest that) and
that from now on people will have a bulk of work to compare
new albums to, not just endtroducing. he also thinks this is
an album that'll stand on its own years from now, like
endtroducing and psyence fiction.


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-01-07 14:16 [#00505505]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00505484



that sucks neetta :-(
I don't really know what to say to that... i'm almost
leaning towards "it's okay for you to download" ;-) I mean
if you have no other way of getting ahold of the music. It's
a little bit Warp's own fault then :-o For not having better
distribution.

I don't have alot of experience with ordering cd's yet... so
i'm not very aware of how high the shipping-costs are. Can't
your local record-store order aphex twin either? That's the
only semi-good advice i can think of to give you :-)


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-01-07 14:17 [#00505506]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



no, i admit i did not read it.but this issue bugs me ALOT. i
feel so bad for not being able to support :(


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-01-07 14:17 [#00505508]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



surrounded,

I think you're way too idealistic. You don't seem to get it
that its their choice to do what they want to do. Ofcourse I
appreciate what they do and that is why I pay £10 for their
CDs and post on boards like this etc. But apart from that I
mean what the hell do you want me to do? Do you want me to
do cartwheels or something and say er I'm really really
grateful you guys have enriched my life. If these artists
struggle to make a living I don't give a shit its their
choice its that simple. So please get a life.


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-01-07 14:23 [#00505514]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



"You don't seem to get it that its their choice to do
what they want to do
"

So would you rather see they did not do what they do?

Be fair... indeed it's their own choice to do what they do.
But if you like what they do... you should say: "hey man, i
like what you do! Keep at it!" And so you support them.

"why I pay £10 for their CDs"

well that's all i'm asking really :-p

I have to go now... i'll check with this thread later.


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-01-07 14:27 [#00505517]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



like there would even be a local record store here :D in
helsinki they probably can but costs alot and they rarely
order 'rare' stuff like warp etc.


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-01-07 16:48 [#00505647]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



i actually didn't read the article at the link (for some
reason my computer always fucks up whenever i try to install
shockwave... i just gave up, 90% of the sites use flash
anyway). I figured i would understand what it was about as i
read this thread ;-)

"shadow isn't protesting mp3 downloading, but people who
download albums and don't buy them.
"

Well that's my point of view exactly. I don't hate mp3's or
filesharing. If everyone used it wisely, filesharing would
be a GREAT way of learning about new music.
However, many people aren't able to handle the
responsibility, and download without buying anyway. That's
like borrowing books from the library. And then deciding you
like the books so much you're gonna keep them. It's just
wrong. Morally wrong and also illegal.

"he's not thumbing his nose at anyone who can't afford
$20 an album
"

ehr... doesn't that kinda contradict what he said about
people who download albums and don't buy them?

My momma always said if you can't afford something, work for
it!


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-01-07 16:54 [#00505652]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00505517



"like there would even be a local record store here
:D
"

lol, that bad huh?

And how far is it to helsinki? I actually can't buy alot of
cd's that fit my taste in my hometown either...

But in my case the next big city is only 15 minutes by train
away :-)


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-01-07 17:27 [#00505685]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00505503



Tits, I did read the article. But you didn't read between
the lines.

Let me break it down for you my sweet buttercup: from now
on, anything that can be reduced to ones and zeroes will be
passed around like a prison bitch.

The artist has to become the most efficient distributor of
prison bitches, instead of whining like a bitch.

Maybe we should get those fine men who beat on Moby to pay
Shadow a visit and really give him something to whine about.


 

offline Asche XL on 2003-01-07 17:32 [#00505696]
Points: 4241 Status: Lurker



If if it's good I buy it, and if it's not I don't.

I download music this way I dont get ripped off on buying a
shitty cd. I'll burn a cd when I only like one or two songs
off the cd.....


 

offline MachineofGod from the land of halo's (United States) on 2003-01-07 18:19 [#00505734]
Points: 3088 Status: Lurker



tits, another great thread, thanks for the shadow link, good
read. I do agree with what he said and I do have to say
that i wouldnt have 75% of my collection had it not been for
downloading mp3s. i have over 200 cds (all genuine), mp3s
are just samples for me. I dont even burn cds for just a
few songs, i dont buy albums with only a "few" good songs,
its not worth it unless the whole album or most of it is
good.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-01-07 18:33 [#00505747]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i always thought musicians that are most affected because of
downloading are the pop musicians-and the reason for that is
because they dont make quality music-music that lasts/i mean
they release an album and its out of trend in six months, so
why buying it?
from what i can see on this mb, people are mostly buying
quality albums
i got this impression that lots of people here buy older
releases if they get into certain artist
i could be wrong tho :)


 

offline MachineofGod from the land of halo's (United States) on 2003-01-07 18:37 [#00505751]
Points: 3088 Status: Lurker



"i got this impression that lots of people here buy older
releases if they get into certain artist
i could be wrong tho :)?

sounds the same way to me, time doesnt affect truly good
music (i suppose thats subjective but anyways)unlike say
britney spears etc.
i mean i buy older coil albums, nww and einsturzende
neubauten still so yeah, id agree with you impression there.


 

offline MachineofGod from the land of halo's (United States) on 2003-01-07 18:41 [#00505755]
Points: 3088 Status: Lurker



I also have a 56k so its only good for downloading a few
tracks and not full album. the only full albums I have
downloaded are like out of print or stuff that never got
released.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-01-07 18:48 [#00505761]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i had a fast connection for a long time now, and i hardly
downloaded any music
i mostly use it to check the music and if i like it i buy it
(which happens a lot hehe)


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-01-07 19:38 [#00505782]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00505685



so you'd rather have the truly creative--who have to fight
off not only the anti-art slant to the music INDUSTRY but
also their technically savvy and not necessarily
issue-educated fans--spend less time making and performing
their music and more time promoting it? sounds a little
unreasonable to me.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-01-07 19:46 [#00505789]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #00505747



tolstoyed: the point shadow is making is that there are fans
out there who really appreciate an album/artist but STILL
won't fork over the cash to buy the album. instead they burn
it or keep it on their computer. that's all he's talking
about--not previewing before buying or people downloading
and not liking it.

most of the cd's i own (which is in the hundreds) is cos i
either downloaded single mp3's or whole albums. i think
anyone w/ a brain would not say mp3 downloading has no
purpose. but there really IS a large percentage of people
who download and then don't purchase albums they like. i
think if everyone here was honest about that we'd prolly get
about half of us who admit to loving albums and then not
buying them afterwards. not all the time, but sometimes. i
did it when i was 16 before i really knew what it was like
to be a less famous/rich artist. once i understood i stopped
doing cd-r's.


 

offline Duble0Syx from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2003-01-07 20:24 [#00505843]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker



I fnever downloaded mp3's I wouldn't own a lot of the cd's I
do. That And I use mp3's to backup my cd's in case someone
steals them. Yes I do share them on p2p programs, but only
because I hope someone else can appreciate the music the way
I do and buy it.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-01-08 01:10 [#00506011]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00505383



I'm not a socialist loony. Are you aware that the music and
film industry is run by massive conglomerates like Time
Warner? How do you think these people make their vast
profits? Take a look around.

As for that old chestnut about not putting a gun to their
heads; by that rational any choice you make in life is your
own unless someone is threatening you with physical
violence. People make choices based on a number of different
factors and pressures. The world works in more subtle ways
than your brain can cope with I'm afraid.


 


Messageboard index