Funkstörung are underrated | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 213 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614302
Today 23
Topics 127557
  
 
Messageboard index
Funkstörung are underrated
 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-12-27 15:05 [#00492847]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



that's what i find, anyway..

i just purchased Appetite for Destruction yesterday and i
just finished listening to it the whole way through. i found
it truly amazing..



 

offline Clic on 2002-12-27 15:11 [#00492849]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular



Brother, I feel you.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-27 15:11 [#00492851]
Points: 21460 Status: Lurker



I calculated their rate to be 45 miles per hour. They also
revealed the existence of crunch. I love appetite for
disktruction.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-12-27 15:19 [#00492865]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



not underrated in my books.

afd is well grandiose


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2002-12-27 16:07 [#00492904]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



Well...they r Autechre wannabes....but I still like em' !


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-12-27 16:10 [#00492905]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular



i own afd, but i dont feel it's as mindblowing as people led
me to believe. some great track though.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-27 16:37 [#00492924]
Points: 21460 Status: Lurker



"wannabe" is automatically assumed to be degrading.
the second to last track on "marion" by fakesch is so damn
good. One might even say I'm a funkstorung wannabe. One
might even take a ride on a tricycle with cookie monster to
the store to buy some eggs. One might even split in half,
thus becoming two... or split into two seperate
unproportional pieces. Hmm, what else do I have to say... oh
yeah, nothing.


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-12-27 16:40 [#00492926]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular | Followup to w M w: #00492924



it surprises me how much time and effort you devote to your
posts. but at least theyre somewhat entertaining.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-27 16:52 [#00492931]
Points: 21460 Status: Lurker



Does that really surprise you considering the large number
of socially inept people with computers that exist today?
Perhaps you carelessly chose to say that "it surprised you"
when really you only meant to observe that I put a lot of
time and effort into my posts. I don't think they're merely
"somewhat" entertaining either. I think they're reading for
the gods. I think the polytheistic monarchy reads my posts
ritually.


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-12-27 17:05 [#00492935]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular | Followup to w M w: #00492931



but sometimes, it seems you try a little too hard, and this
was a perfect illustration of this.

oh well!


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2002-12-27 17:09 [#00492937]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



hell ain't hearrd orr hearrd of them...


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-27 17:24 [#00492954]
Points: 21460 Status: Lurker



"Cortex's Precise Graph of Standards on the Tolerable Input
of Time and Effort Spent on Posting Messages" An invaluable
recource.
Author: cortex
Publisher: Fart poo books
copyright: 1989 - 6


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-12-27 17:34 [#00492963]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular | Followup to w M w: #00492954



good, i must admit that was much better. i thought for a
moment you were losing your status.


 


Messageboard index