SAW | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 406 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614262
Today 9
Topics 127551
  
 
Messageboard index
SAW
 

offline Daphex_Dewine from Lilla Edet (Sweden) on 2002-11-13 10:17 [#00440372]
Points: 401 Status: Lurker



the new SAW 85-92 release....is it better soundquality on
that one??? or what


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2002-11-13 10:27 [#00440384]
Points: 40080 Status: Regular



is it a question or are you telling us ?

i thought the quality on the original was just fine.


 

offline Daphex_Dewine from Lilla Edet (Sweden) on 2002-11-13 10:28 [#00440385]
Points: 401 Status: Lurker



that was a question......i think the old sound is a
littlebit....not clean...


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2002-11-13 10:29 [#00440388]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



yeah

the noise really adds something.. just listen to xtal to
understand.. la lahlala.... im in love with that track its
so perfect


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-11-13 10:29 [#00440389]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker



I think the answer is "or what" or else we would have heard
about it by now.


 

offline Daphex_Dewine from Lilla Edet (Sweden) on 2002-11-13 10:31 [#00440390]
Points: 401 Status: Lurker



I am Jacks stinking revenge


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-11-13 12:20 [#00440532]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



I think they're identical, in terms of noise.


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-11-13 13:14 [#00440576]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



i think SAW II is cleaner than SAW I


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-11-13 16:39 [#00440628]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



Yes, SAW 85-92 was re-released in the United States, because
you could only previously get it as an import, I believe.


 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2002-11-13 16:40 [#00440631]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



what the hell?
SAW sounds right
and there isnt a new one...
why compare the saw noice to saw2??
i think these albums are really differents...
saw is entertaining and perfect
saw2 is more complicated and perfect



 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-11-13 17:27 [#00440604]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



Daphex, are you comparing the new release of SAW 85-92 to
the old one? Or SAW 86-92 to SAW II?


 

offline BILE from São Paulo (Brazil) on 2002-11-13 17:31 [#00440607]
Points: 1769 Status: Regular



what do you guys mean the new one and the old one? i know
there's a SAW 1 and a SAW II, but was SAW 1 reissued or
something?


 

offline Clic on 2002-11-13 17:32 [#00440610]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular



Wow and flutter.


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-11-13 17:33 [#00440615]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



new and improved SAW?

hell, i want that!!


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-11-13 17:45 [#00440818]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



hes talking about the piazzo rerelease, and no, theres no
difference, and thats how it should be.


 

offline uviol from United States on 2002-11-13 17:48 [#00440824]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Phresch: #00440615



I bought the original from a store right as the reissue came
out. My cousin bought the reissue. I didn't notice any
difference.


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-11-13 17:49 [#00440826]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



oh, ok. but IMO he should have done something about the
sound quality, tho...


 

offline E-man from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2002-11-13 17:54 [#00440833]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular | Followup to Phresch: #00440826



no, it simply is part of the music/sound


 

offline uviol from United States on 2002-11-13 17:56 [#00440838]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



Yeah, I have mixed feelings about the surface noise. I
agree with you that it's kind of annoying when you want to
hear the sounds clearly.. but in another way I agree with
e-man in that it's kida conducive to the hazy, ambient feel
of the LP. kinda hard to decide which is more important..


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-11-13 17:59 [#00440842]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



it sounds like he's spilled one too many drinks on his
master tape.


 

offline E-man from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2002-11-13 18:00 [#00440849]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular | Followup to Phresch: #00440842



to me it sound like it's coming from old tapes made by him
trough is teens... and it's exactly what the lp is, no?


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-11-13 18:11 [#00440867]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"and it's exactly what the lp is, no?"

good point, but it's probably the same there as well.


 

offline E-man from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2002-11-13 18:13 [#00440870]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular | Followup to Phresch: #00440867



i guess it's down to personal taste =)


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-11-13 19:00 [#00440959]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



Yeah many of the recordings were made when he was a teen, so
he didn't have access to top-notch studio equipment, so
there isn't much that can be done w/ the master tapes.


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-11-13 19:53 [#00441015]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



i think that the general atmosphere, and moreover, the
character of SAW comes from its haziness, like the music is
slightly smudged. i love that. anyway, some tracks have fine
sound quality, like green calx or pulsewidth, and the ones
that don't are excellent as they are.


 


Messageboard index