Waking Life... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
dariusgriffin
ijonspeches
...and 374 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614263
Today 10
Topics 127551
  
 
Messageboard index
Waking Life...
 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-11-11 23:21 [#00438119]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



sounds like good stuff. lems humor is something special
from what i read. i'll have to pick up some new books
pretty soon, despite the fact i don't have time to read a
single chapter from biology textbook.


 

offline deadwhitespoon from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-11-11 23:24 [#00438121]
Points: 271 Status: Lurker



The Futurological Congress is, like, 150 pages, and the
others are episodic...almost like short stories. I read one
before I go to sleep. Then I have weird dreams until I start
playing with light switches and realize that IU'm dreaming
and then I go off looking for more books. Can't read 'em
though...the letters keep shifting from one to another.


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2002-11-11 23:52 [#00438139]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker



i think a lot of people go into all movies with a lot of
cynicism... it seems that often, people watch movies with
the intent of tearing them apart
as if the only way they enjoy movies is by playing critic
throughout

kinda like those people who go to sporting events just to
heckle the players



 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-11-11 23:53 [#00438141]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



well, possibly

but i for one, love movies. i love the experiance. id say im
a move addict actually

it just pisses me off to no end when something that gets so
much praise, is so crappy in my eyes


 

offline steve from chicago on 2002-11-11 23:56 [#00438144]
Points: 1156 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00438141



Makes you feel left out?


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2002-11-11 23:59 [#00438147]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00438141



thats why its good to disregard the opinions of others.. its
best to go into a movie without any kind of bias based on
what others have said about it


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-11-12 00:01 [#00438150]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



makes me feel angery.

kind of in the same way as how I feel when people talk about
how great nsync or any other crappy music is.



 

offline steve from chicago on 2002-11-12 00:06 [#00438153]
Points: 1156 Status: Lurker



That sounds like you have some issues you need to sort out.
Like I used to get angry when people would pick an
independant 'art film' to bash, when there's plenty of
hollywood crap out there for them to sink their teeth into.


 

offline Mush from Westfield (United States) on 2002-11-12 00:07 [#00438155]
Points: 60 Status: Regular



Solaris Was Andrei Tarkovsky. One of the best filmakers ever
in my opinion.

As to waking life, i havnt seen it yet so i will not comment
on the film, but as to the discussion... Any work of art
can be seen as pretentious by some, While it may have a true
core of meaning to others. Many people consider IDM to be
"spacey gibberish" and think it has no merit whatsoever.
The truth is (in my humble view) that anyone who speaks of a
work of art as being pretentious, worthless, crap, etc... is
in fact being pretentious themself. Im probly being
pretentious right now. I just find it silly that anyone
can say bad things about art that they do not like. if they
do not like it, thats understandable. Other people do like
it, and it just means that they see something in it that the
disliker does not. Subjectivity. I dont think it is
possible for art to fail. People talk of better art being
pure and bad art being pretentious. but art is a reflection
of the artist. so it suceeds in reflecting that image be it
good or bad.
anyways.... thats piss,
all i am saying is that you should always respect a piece of
art enough to not rip it to shreds. whether you like it or
not.
it cant be worthless.



 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-11-12 00:07 [#00438156]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



i think not


 

offline denniscpearce from Canada on 2002-11-12 00:09 [#00438157]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular



waking life bugged me because they used the auto rotoscoping
stuff , but made the effect all dirty so it looked like it
was being done by hand or somehting.
it was just proccessed from live action, i guess a bunch of
stuff was actually drawn in , .
as for linklater, i thaught slacker was very good


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-11-12 00:10 [#00438158]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



everyone has opinions and perspectives on things

i stand by my opinions and perspectives, because they are
mine.

you go ahead and think you're right, and ill go ahead and
think im right.



 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-11-12 09:20 [#00438531]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Mush: #00438155



i tend to see the arts much the same. every little piece
serve its purpose, for the artist and those who
witness/listen.


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2002-11-12 09:46 [#00438558]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker | Followup to Mush: #00438155



and thats why i think the word 'pretentious' is over used..
i always think its ironic when people take the position of
critic.. and call things pretentious
reading movie and music reviews by 'professional' critics
always annoys me... a lot of times these critics dont make
movies or music themselves.. they just devote their energy
to criticizing the work of those who do... i suppose i'm
going beyond the thread now... but i tend to think that art
should be criticized by other active artists
going back to the people who heckle sports.. they probably
suck at playing the sport themselves..

so yeah..it just annoyes me when people are really
opinionated about things..
especially knowing that none of the people who bash movies
could probably make a better movie themselves...and probably
have no intention of trying

denniscpearce: all the animation actually was traced by hand
by a bunch of different artists... hence the hand-drawn
look

and yeah, i liked slacker too.. i didnt see it as very
different from waking life, actually


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-12 10:23 [#00438593]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Mush: #00438155



WOOHOO I've finally catched on to which film it actually is
you were talking about.. its been out here and is gone
already.. and I missed it. I would've liked to seen it.

anyway..

"but i tend to think that art should be criticized by
other active artists"


thats bullshit. why should they know more about art than the
"normal man"? this would imply that art can only be really
appreciated by other artists. and then we could take it to a
next step - artists can only be reviewed by other artists
who are on roughly the same 'level of talent'.

when I let people read my plays (I write plays and other
texts), they sometimes say: "oh, but I don't know anything
about theatre, so what can I say".. who cares!? you are a
human being aren't you? you read it and have thoughts about
while, or after reading it - express those, however badly
vocalised.

finally, it really annoyes me when people are kind of
unopinionated about things.. ART IS NOT HOLY.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-11-12 10:28 [#00438599]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



art IS holy... but like a religion, you dont have to be a
preist to believe in a religion

but otherwise i agree with everything you said.


 

offline xian_ecci from los angeles on 2002-11-12 10:49 [#00438615]
Points: 251 Status: Regular



a liked waking life very much.
first off, if there's ever been a movie to light a spliff
to, this is it. TRY IT AGAIN.
second, if you watch the movie to find an original glimse
into the meaning of life, you are wasting your time. in
fact, the movie seems totally opposed to any revelation or
conclusion like that (like if we're even awake at all).
while you might be interested in what these people are
blabbering about, that's just a bonus. to me the drone of
philosophy and everyday ideas is just the blanket for you to
concentrate on the movement of the screen, and the
CHARACTERS!
it's like listening to an aphex track, where the melody
strings along while the snares fucking rip though it.
the transitions between the different artists are nice too
-- like a dj set, they sequence them with either
similarities or variations (in color, strokes, frame speed,
etc.). the movie flows sometimes, or it studders, or blows
up. like the one on the bkln bridge.
at some points i just fell out in the theatre laughing (i
know, the herb helps)...just seeing these cartoons talking
serious thoughts with their faces melting and scratching
around. the producers definately knew how to blend
emotions. like that kook who torched himself -- everyone in
the theatre was so fucking shocked or confused i just had to
bust out laughing, even though it was so brutal. like
seeing peoples expressions at a squarepusher show.
anyway, i told my mom to watch it and she hated it.


 

offline xian_ecci from los angeles on 2002-11-12 10:53 [#00438618]
Points: 251 Status: Regular



a liked waking life very much.
first off, if there's ever been a movie to light a spliff
to, this is it. TRY IT AGAIN.
second, if you watch the movie to find an original glimse
into the meaning of life, you are wasting your time. in
fact, the movie seems totally opposed to any revelation or
conclusion like that (like if we're even awake at all).
while you might be interested in what these people are
blabbering about, that's just a bonus. to me the drone of
philosophy and everyday ideas is just the blanket for you to

concentrate on the movement of the screen, and the
CHARACTERS!
it's like listening to an aphex track, where the melody
strings along while the snares fucking rip though it.
the transitions between the different artists are nice too
-- like a dj set, they sequence them with either
similarities or variations (in color, strokes, frame speed,

etc.). the movie flows sometimes, or it studders, or blows
up. like the one on the bkln bridge.
at some points i just fell out in the theatre laughing (i
know, the herb helps)...just seeing these cartoons talking
serious thoughts with their faces melting and scratching
around. the producers definately knew how to blend
emotions. like that kook who torched himself -- everyone in

the theatre was so fucking shocked or confused i just had to

bust out laughing, even though it was so brutal. like
seeing peoples expressions at a squarepusher show.
anyway, i told my mom to watch it and she hated it.



 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-12 10:55 [#00438621]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Zeus: #00438599



NO!

(oops, sorry..)

no, art is NOT holy. it is made by humans, so it can have
faults, it should be allowed to be flawed, but that also
means one can have an opinion about it, however polarized
that opinion may be.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-11-12 11:14 [#00438654]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



Waking life was horrible, it was just trying to be different
for the sake of being different, it was a waste of my time.
It was just so lame.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-11-12 13:01 [#00438899]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to REFLEX: #00438654



yeah reflex, i'm quite sure richard linklater just
desperately wants to be different. i can just hear him,
"damnit, it's too much like such and such, i'll never be an
individual!"

qter, why is human-made with faults not holy? i think
different people have different meanings for the word. i
know my defination does not include "flawless" or "not mad
by human".


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2002-11-12 19:56 [#00439354]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker



eh i suppose i kinda worded that badly..

i actually dont think there should be such a distinction
between 'artists', 'normal people' and 'critics'

it just seems to me that when someone takes the official
position of being a critic.. writing reviews for papers and
magazines or whatever... they're placing themselves above
both the artists and the 'normal people' ..making them
hypocritical when they call things pretentious

so yeah.. i dont think critics' opinions should be more
valid just because they're published...

which is why i think people should make up their own minds
about movies and music and art.. and disregard what
critics.. and other people say
like you said.. everyone is able to appreciate art on their
own...they shouldn't have it translated by someone who's
declared themselves a 'critic'



 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-12 19:59 [#00439364]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to wayout: #00439354



ah but surely that lies in peoples perception of critics,
what a critic's work entails?


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-12 20:00 [#00439369]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to jupitah: #00438899



jupitah: that wasn't really the point. my points was, as its
human-made, it can have faults, and because something has
faults, you can talk about those, i.e. you may be critical
about art.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-11-12 20:47 [#00439491]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



well, since i dont believe in religion, Art is considered
Holy in my book.


 

offline deadwhitespoon from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-11-13 18:49 [#00440931]
Points: 271 Status: Lurker



I think religion is totally pretentious. Actually I found
Dogma to pretty pretentious. But funny, too. Religions that
give the responsibility of our lives and fate to some
"higher, sentient being" or "God" frightens me. I didn't
vote for Jesus. Churches are theatres. Catch phrases get
tired.

I think critisizing WL for it's "hand-drawn style", implying
that all computer graphic art is about precision and anal
retentive "neatness", is down right repressive on those that
use the medium. And that's all it is...a medium. If the
medium succeeds in conveying it's (dream-like) message then
it's been well used. If it doesn't work, then we must
reprogram the viewer, cause they're all lazy couch
potato-heads.

I think Waking Life is important for no other reason that
bringing the idea of the dream back to the forefront of
popular culture.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-11-13 20:44 [#00441054]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to deadwhitespoon: #00440931



yeah, dreaming in itself is profound. such a mystery. we
spend so much of our life in dream.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-11-13 20:44 [#00441055]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to deadwhitespoon: #00440931



yeah, dreaming in itself is profound. such a mystery. we
spend so much of our life in dream.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-13 20:46 [#00441056]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to jupitah: #00441055



well not that much time really.. you really only dream for
10 to 20 minutes in the beginning of the REM-sleep.. when
you wake up you don't really wake up from a dream but from
the memory..


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-11-13 20:52 [#00441061]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



that's not true, sometimes the sound of my alarm enters my
dream and integrates before i wake up. and sometimes i wake
up really early in the night from dream, and then i go to
sleep and wake up from dream again, and then i might have a
third round before waking the next morning. but any how, if
it is only about fifteen minutes a night that's still
significant. and when i dream it's such a dense experience
that it's probably equivelent to three hours of mindsless
biology lab.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-13 21:02 [#00441071]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



yes.. but at those points you are not technically dreaming..
at those moments you are "reliving" the memory in your
sleep..

I would also guess that every time you wake a new
sleep-cycle starts, with a new REM-period for a new dream to
evolve.


 

offline Alliat from Kópavogur (Iceland) on 2002-11-13 21:04 [#00441073]
Points: 403 Status: Regular | Followup to jupitah: #00441061



I'm having that same thing going on with my alarm clock...
It just enters my dream as a theft alarm or something and I
won't wake up.
There's a nother weird thing. -all the sounds and noises
arround me while i'm snoosing in the morning ( shower,
traffic, mom doing dishes etc...) enter my dreams with a
great deetail... It's like my subconciousness knows what the
next sound will be and precisely when it will be heard and
puts it into context in my dream... Anyone know what I'm
talkin about?


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-13 21:07 [#00441077]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to qrter: #00441071



I mean, if you sleep 8 hours, you don't remember a dream of
8 hours, do you..?

its a loop.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-11-13 21:26 [#00441094]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #00441077



i didn't think that anyone dreams for 8 hours. but anyway,
the point is, almost every single night (maybe every night
but i don't always remember) i live out alternate realities.
i find it interesting, to say the least. the more i
explore my dreams when i wake up, the more i remember them
and the more intense, abstract (psychedelic even) they
become. people who are seriously interested in exploring
their dreams are able to become lucid and go into astral
projection. its just such a huge mystery. consciousness
leaving the body just seems profound to me, and everybody
does it.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-13 21:46 [#00441109]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to jupitah: #00441094



oh it is. I agree with you on that.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-11-13 22:04 [#00441128]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



lol, i was start to think you were a cold one.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-13 22:06 [#00441129]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to jupitah: #00441128



well I am the non-bull-shitty kind.

but I still think dreaming is pretty weird. it kind of
freaks me out, man.. (imagine Kramer doing one of his
patented arm movements here..)


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-11-13 22:48 [#00441195]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



you were just reminding me of my dad for a bit. he's so
skepticle that he just misses out.


 


Messageboard index