|
|
raimons
from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-07-27 08:16 [#00326838]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker
|
|
f...k you!
|
|
raimons
from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-07-27 08:17 [#00326840]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker
|
|
sorry bout that man... im a starwars nerd ya know..
|
|
princo
from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-07-27 08:19 [#00326841]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker
|
|
i hate the new computer shit they did to it.....love them midgits in the wax suits :D
|
|
nanotech
from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2002-07-27 08:20 [#00326844]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular | Followup to raimons: #00326840
|
|
yeah, you can divide the whole net population into trekkies, and starwars fans...
starwars just never did it for me.
anyways, the matrix is the next big "generation trilogy." can't wait for part 2.
|
|
raimons
from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-07-27 08:24 [#00326848]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker | Followup to nanotech: #00326844
|
|
hey...i really tried to understand the matrix but it really sucks big time..sorry...
keano reeves is probobly the worst actor i know of. But im not going into tjis discussion with you about starwars overall.
Ive been into starwars sen i was 5 years old and i still love the crap... so please please.. star trek what is that?
|
|
nanotech
from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2002-07-27 08:29 [#00326854]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular | Followup to raimons: #00326848
|
|
well, i'm sorry that u dislike the matrix, seeing that it's far better than starwars. Starwars just seems to be a wannabe jim henson production with space muppets. And no morals to any of the movies. Keanue reeves is a diffrent story. I have mixed feelings about him, but i think he did the role decently. Anyways, matrix is loaded with reflections of society, zen budhism, self realization...i could go on and on.
like u said before, let's not get tooo much into it. I can fully understand ppl liking star wars from since they were 5. I think i saw it back then too. We all have our guilty little pleasures.
|
|
raimons
from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-07-27 08:31 [#00326856]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker
|
|
i meen come on! what is Spock compared to darth vader or the emperor? hahaha!! come on!!!
|
|
raimons
from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-07-27 08:36 [#00326863]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker
|
|
i think i`ll stop here...
|
|
AMinal
from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-07-27 08:38 [#00326865]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular
|
|
ya, original for SURE
|
|
skodt
from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-07-27 16:51 [#00327098]
Points: 672 Status: Regular
|
|
i don't think nanotek knows that jim henson was in on starwars?
i also don't think he knows that star trek fans are LOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSERSS!
do not spam our star wars thread you tosser! .........love...................how................it...... start your own ' i wanker.....................................al.............. cho......................................holic............. ................takes................................that ...........................james....................T. kirk..........................so long..........................to ............................................say ..........................................a fucking thing!!!!!!'
thread, and see how many flops join in that one! i promise we won't, as star wars fans, insult ourselves by comparing yr shiite, made for tv plop with a true epic of good versus evil.
and it's samurai's that the jedi were made after youdoink! SO 'F' OFF!
|
|
flea
from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-07-27 16:54 [#00327102]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular
|
|
the original was stupid but naive so forgivable.. the Special Edition was unleashed with full knowledge of its dumbness..that's unforgivable...
|
|
skodt
from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-07-27 16:55 [#00327103]
Points: 672 Status: Regular
|
|
what the hell happened there?! it was supposed to read like this>
start your own ' i ...................................... ...................................how..................... ...........................long............................ love ........it.......
................takes................................that ...........................james....................T. kirk wanker.....................................al.............. cho......................................holic............. ..........................so long..........................to ............................................say ..........................................a fucking thing!!!!!!' thread,
|
|
skodt
from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-07-27 16:56 [#00327104]
Points: 672 Status: Regular
|
|
what!!!!!!!! this is stupid, this mb is fukt right now! i give up. you get the point anyway. flea has flea's geek.
|
|
Windriff
from United Kingdom on 2002-07-27 17:00 [#00327107]
Points: 37 Status: Regular
|
|
I really think the remastered version with the enhanced graphix made the film much better than the original one back in the 1970s. didnt the producer say he couldnt afford to do it proper because he didnt have the cash or the technology to make it how he watned it to look back then
|
|
Smyrma
from Beloit, WI (United States) on 2002-07-27 17:27 [#00327119]
Points: 2478 Status: Lurker
|
|
Both the original and the special edition have good and bad qualities. But I think I prefer the original for one reason:
...GREEDO SHOOTS FIRST in the special edition. BULLSHIT.
|
|
issation civil
from Vienna (Austria) on 2002-07-27 17:30 [#00327122]
Points: 195 Status: Regular
|
|
original! the se-scenes are too different to the original! funny: in the german version darth vader has another voice in ONE SCENE! it sounds so terrible! *lol*
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2002-07-27 17:35 [#00327131]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to issation civil: #00327122
|
|
I love see what it looks like in other languages. I wonder if the DVD version will have that option - whenever they are to be released!
Smyrma - I had forgotten that scene....yeah Greedo shooting Han first was a mistake, they shouldn't of changed that. And the Jabba scene wasn't as good as it couldve been. But the rest is good. The new X-wing footage at the end of the film it great, and the new shots of Mos Eisley are superb!
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-07-27 17:39 [#00327132]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
I don't think I've seen the originals, NOT remasterd... or maybe I did. But I know I've watched the re-tooled 90's versions. I liked them a lot, much better than the souless Episodes 1 and 2.
I don't know the difference between the old and ''new'' scenes, but I DO know that 4, 5, and 6 have great stories and characters. Effects, I kind of ignore.
|
|
Steamtank
from Melancholia Isle (Poland) on 2002-07-27 17:46 [#00327139]
Points: 1271 Status: Regular
|
|
the remastered version is better. maybe i am sayin that beacause i havent seen the old version in cinema (only in tv).
the new endin of rotj is quiete good- i cant find anything fucked up there.
btw what is your ranking of SW parts (top3)?
1.empire strikes back 2.return of the jedi 3.attack of the clones
|
|
nanotech
from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2002-07-27 20:15 [#00327300]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular | Followup to skodt: #00327098
|
|
actually, it's the shaolin monks they're modeled after, not the samuari (still laughing my ass off). I said ninja's because i didn't know that star wars fans knew anything diffrent.
|
|
skodt
from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-07-28 17:00 [#00328091]
Points: 672 Status: Regular
|
|
actually dude, the star wars story is a rip off an asian one.
in the asian story, it wasn't the shaolin monks, it was samurai.
later certain philosophical adn religious additions were made to the characters because george felt that it was too similar.
ex>the appearance. they were created for episode 4-6 as ronin>master-less samurai>the destrustion of the jedi order after the clone wars.
|
|
raimons
from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-07-28 18:09 [#00328166]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker
|
|
i love return of the jedi just bec of the ending with the emperor..i love thta guy...
|
|
diablo
on 2002-07-30 00:11 [#00329829]
Points: 3242 Status: Lurker
|
|
The original. Re-doing scenes of a classic movie just coz you can is lame. I like the old skool "analogue" feel of the original.
|
|
Aaladorn
from Hull (United States) on 2002-07-30 01:27 [#00329872]
Points: 123 Status: Lurker
|
|
true that, Diablo...werd.
|
|
corngrower
from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2002-07-30 01:28 [#00329874]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker
|
|
neither, HA!
|
|
Aaladorn
from Hull (United States) on 2002-07-30 01:33 [#00329878]
Points: 123 Status: Lurker
|
|
You people that don't like Star Wars say it like you've accomplished something. Congradulations?
|
|
Messageboard index
|