A question for you music makers... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 352 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
A question for you music makers...
 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-05-09 11:25 [#00212040]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



A dilema I frequently come across when making music is that
I have one or 2 really good bits of melody in a track and
the rest is mediocre. I'm tempted to use the really good bit
more in the track, but I feel that this would "dilute" them
somehow. I remember boards of canada saying about how they
liked to include a nice sample or bar ONCE in a song to make
you listen to the song again and again, just to hear it.

When I hear a lot of "pop" IT seems as though a producer got
the 1 or 2 good bars and just looped them continously.
Perhaps that's the reason you get tired of pop songs so
quickly whereas you can replay some music 100s of times and
they're still as listenable as the 10th time.

What are your views on this?


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2002-05-09 11:27 [#00212043]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Whatever works for you.

How does it sound in the end after you have looped those one
or two bars?

I sometimes loop shit for an entire song, but normally it
never makes the entirety of the song. There are other
interesting bits to use. Remember to vary the beats a lot
when you use a loop for a good portion of a song... cause
otherwise it starts to get boring fast.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2002-05-09 11:28 [#00212045]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



I sometimes loop shit for most of a song, but normally it
never makes the entirety of the song.

Or something along that line.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-05-09 11:30 [#00212048]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



I disagree to an extent. A good hook makes a song
interesting. But a truly excellent hook makes up the song
(if you catch my drift). "Blame Canada" or "Shut your
fucking face unclefucker" from Southpark are the examples
that come to my mind the quickest: they are build almost
solely on hooks and I still want to hear them over and over
again. Just as Public Enemy lifted a riff off one of the
best Slayer songs and made "She watch channel zero" and it
still stands as one of their catchiest songs!!!


 

offline Fernz from A Scottish Wanker (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-09 12:06 [#00212094]
Points: 1692 Status: Regular



I dunno... I try varying melody but I concentrate on my
drumloops more. I try to change them as often as I can but
theyre very tiny changes. I see your point Ceri but if I
were you I would just find a method that suits you and stick
to it I guess.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-05-09 12:09 [#00212099]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Fernz: #00212094 | Show recordbag



I think that's the best balance- copy the pattern and just
make slight changes like 1 or 2 notes on each "variation".
Thanks.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-05-09 12:14 [#00212105]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker



i try to use the same method that you quote BOC as saying --
i am steadily working away from looping -- but yeah, if you
must loop, at least use variations, or use the ABAB, AABB
&tc formulas from classical melody writing


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-05-09 12:20 [#00212114]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to marlowe: #00212105 | Show recordbag



I tend to use a ABCBCA Type of pattern- returning to the
start for the end, but not playing it again in the middle.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-05-09 12:21 [#00212115]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker



mmmm a melodic sandwich!


 

offline Phatbert 000 from Augsburg (Germany) on 2002-05-09 12:21 [#00212118]
Points: 1618 Status: Lurker



too much of the same loop makes the listener go loopy, so
slight variations every now and then keeps it interesting.


 

offline Phatbert 000 from Augsburg (Germany) on 2002-05-09 12:24 [#00212121]
Points: 1618 Status: Lurker



...or of course you could use the Underworld method of
having the exact same loops for ages but constantly adding
more and more layers. In theory it should sound shit and
does most of the time (see Eurotrance) but somewho
Underworld seem to pull it off rather marvellously (see Dark
+ Long or the Deep Pan remix of Born Slippy to name just two
tracks)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-05-09 12:27 [#00212125]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Phatbert 000: #00212121 | Show recordbag



It can be quite good when you have breaks from a continuous
loop just for 1 bar here and there in the song. Especially
if it's a quiet background element like light drums. That
way the person suddenly becomes aware that something has
disappeared that they became accustomed too. Then it comes
back in and they're like- oh it was *that* that stopped...


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-05-09 12:30 [#00212129]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to Ceri JC: #00212125



Mate, you've just discovered what Steve Reich discovered
some decades ago. His music is all repetition (well, not all
of it to be honest) that really casts you into trance and
when something changes it's like the Earth itself is being
pulled from under your feet.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-05-09 12:36 [#00212142]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00212129 | Show recordbag



I've heard of reich before, but not that technique or his
music.

Regardless of whether or not I discovered it, it's a
technique I like and use quite a bit :)

It's always good too when the melody plays in reverse (not
the soundwave is reversed) suddenly in a "trance" track.


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2002-05-09 12:37 [#00212144]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker



Nothing wrong with a few well-placed loops.
I tend to do most looping on things that are hard to
hear--namely strange sound samples in the background that
get drowned out by other instruments.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-05-09 12:41 [#00212149]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Spookyluke: #00212144 | Show recordbag



Yeah, I too tend to "completely reverse" (as in reverse the
wave) background stuff rather than main melody.


 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2002-05-09 13:23 [#00212184]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



I really don't use melodies or riffs, but songs like Kaini
Industries (BOC) should really be longer. That bass
line/synth sounds awesome.

The song I recorded last is just a filter pattern swamped in
a huge reverb-delay, for 8 minutes.

-P


 

offline wormsine on 2002-05-09 16:45 [#00212497]
Points: 12 Status: Lurker



Coil does a song on Musick to Play in the Dark V1 where the
melody bounces along then completely flips around the other
direction and back again after a time creating an infinite
loop through the end of the track. very interesting, quite
subtle. the effect is neat in that as if flips over it seems
to be strecthing out like a rubber band before journeying
back the way it came....perpetual motion!!!


 

offline shibumi from United States on 2002-05-09 16:48 [#00212503]
Points: 359 Status: Lurker



She watch channel Zero - what a great song


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2002-05-09 16:55 [#00212515]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



Actually I think its a lot more difficult to make an
intresting track with LESS instruments and changes than one
with tons of stuff going on.

Minimalistic music isnt as easy to produce as it may
seem........


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-05-09 16:57 [#00212518]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



I think music is shifting toward more and more reptition in
songs, less focus on the musical quality, and more focus on
the overall sound. This is too bad because muscians who
actually have some talent are often not exposed as much as
they should be.


 

offline smeagle from Portland (United States) on 2002-05-09 17:16 [#00212547]
Points: 88 Status: Lurker



Nice topic.....

If I do use loops, I use like 2-4 in conjunction w/ each
other, then slowly taking out or replacing them (like doing
ABCABC with each of them individually). It takes time, and
is a pain in the ass, but at the end it CAN BE quiet worth
it......

Some of my more simpler tracks have 2 - 5 loops in
conjunction, with a main melody over the top, that never
loops.....

Many times I'll also just play one track of a song all the
way through on a keyboard, playing pretty much the same
thing, but change it up at build ups - gives a bit more
feel. So it sounds like a loop, but truly isn't....

I'm finding that there is no way I'll ever get away from
solid, dense, melody.....


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2002-05-09 19:48 [#00212725]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker



I like to make the make the sounds so good, that it can just
loop into eternity with little varition!!!


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-05-09 20:21 [#00212746]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker



to wormsine - (about the melody that goes forward and then
back again) that melodic technique was used by bach in one
of his fugues from the Musical Offering -- hofstadter coined
the term "crab canon". it's an interesting melodic technique
which i aim to explore when the time is right

to shibumi - yeah, thats a nice track - have you read CHUCK
D's "rap race and reality" book - he expands the theme there
with some valid points. AND it's a great song title too! :)

to meho: yeah, i guess that's why TRANCE got it's name huh?
i used to make a lot of TRANCE tracks - it was great about
5-8 years ago when there was a lot of beautiful trance
tracks out - i remember a particularly nice cosmic cube ep
from around 93; loops of infinity


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-09 21:03 [#00212781]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to Paco: #00212184



Paco: u got that song on the net?


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-10 00:01 [#00213070]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



my music teacher thinks that i listen to loads of trance
music, because my music compositions are "quite hypnotic"

...i dont listen to trance...


 


Messageboard index