|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2002-04-28 13:03 [#00197786]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker
|
|
The "top 19 non-dance" message seemed to have been written with this in mind. So I figure we might as well start over the same topic. No ellectronics (and that does include NIN and radiohead (since nin is mostly ellectronic stuff, and the last two radiohead studio-albums were writen in acid).
What are your top 19 favorite non-ellectronic artists?
Can't think of any? Well neither can I. EVERYBODY uses ellectronics, and the rest are suckers.
Hah!
|
|
Laserbeak
from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 13:10 [#00197788]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker
|
|
No microphones?
|
|
DirtyPriest
from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2002-04-28 13:11 [#00197789]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker
|
|
TOM WAITS!!!!
Never uses electronics, but he rules the fucking planet, hes a god.
|
|
Phresch
from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-04-28 14:16 [#00197851]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
i don't like non-electronic music
|
|
pantalaimon
from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-28 14:26 [#00197859]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
you sure it was top 19?
phresch thats a bit narrow minded isn't it?
velvet underground nirvana tori amos the cure the beatles
some of those use electronics but not predominantly.
|
|
smokehammer
from Saigon (Vietnam) on 2002-04-28 14:30 [#00197862]
Points: 1463 Status: Lurker
|
|
phobiazero > ban this topic please.
all meaningful acoustic/lyrical music died with Bob Marley.
all who disagree shall burn ! persecute ! kill !
|
|
smokehammer
from Saigon (Vietnam) on 2002-04-28 14:31 [#00197866]
Points: 1463 Status: Lurker
|
|
oh yeah nirvana were quite good
sorry , I'll launch myself onto a fire for that .
|
|
Phresch
from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-04-28 14:58 [#00197884]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
me too. Nirvana was alright, alright.
|
|
Laserbeak
from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 15:05 [#00197889]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Phresch: #00197884
|
|
Nirvana's Nevermind features sampled drumloops, FX and electric guitars, are they allowed?
|
|
Phresch
from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-04-28 15:07 [#00197892]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
nevermind
|
|
spasmsixtynine
from leicester (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-28 15:28 [#00197904]
Points: 337 Status: Lurker
|
|
top 19? where did 19 come from? weird number. how about top 6
mine:
radiohead neil young turin brakes tool system of a down jeff buckley
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-04-28 15:39 [#00197910]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker
|
|
ok, here's mine...
Genesis (Peter Gabriel era) Peter Gabriel (does use electronics, but it's too bad!!! He's not all out electronic by any means)
Pink Floyd Radiohead, Before and including Ok Computer U2 Led Zepplin Dave Matthews Band
This is hard, most of the music I love now is at least partly electronic...
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-04-28 16:01 [#00197950]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker
|
|
Steely Dan also... can't believe I forgot them...
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2002-04-28 16:19 [#00197968]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker
|
|
PAVEMENT DAVID BOWIE VELVET UNDERGROUND PINK FLOYD 66-79 SYD BARRETT THE STOOGES LEONARD COhEN BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN JOHNNY CASH
|
|
regital
from Baltimore (United States) on 2002-04-28 17:10 [#00198028]
Points: 800 Status: Lurker
|
|
Jeff Buckley!!!!!!!!!!!! THE BEST. Numero Uno
Then:
Tori Amos White Stripes Ben Harper Verve Placebo Low Sigur Ros Pavement
|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2002-04-28 17:18 [#00198040]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker
|
|
No electronics. Of course that doesn't include recording equipment.
But radiohead, pink floyd, U2, genesis and david bowie cannot be counted. They use synthesizers, and or have a heavy dsp ellement in their music. And Nirvana can't be counted. I used to be a fan of theirs, so they have to be ellectronic. As well, I will not be accepting any submissions by system of a down, cause that name emotionaly erks me.
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2002-04-28 18:11 [#00198091]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
|
|
u are crazy. Pink Floyd, U2, David Bowie (dunno who genesis are) are not considered "electronic" acts. "alternative" is maybe the right word (although i have no idea exactly what alternative means). and why can't NIRVANA be counted???
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2002-04-28 18:13 [#00198092]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
|
|
radiohead are not electronic artists
|
|
digital messiah
on 2002-04-28 18:21 [#00198097]
Points: 249 Status: Lurker
|
|
elton john is tha bomb
|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2002-04-28 18:22 [#00198100]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker
|
|
because the last two studio albums by radiohead were writen in sonic foundry acid. Its kind of a sequencing and mastering program.
Non ellectronic acts, as I have clearly stipulated, are artists that do not use electronics to make their music. Genesis. Pink floyd, U2, and david bowie all rely highly upon their synthesizers to write their music. Therefore they do not apply towards the non-electronic category. Doesn't mean they are electronic artists.
nirvana is to be considered an electronic artist because I used to be a huge fan. And I only like electronic music. Therefore they must be an electronic band.
|
|
EVOL
from a long time ago on 2002-04-28 19:02 [#00198139]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker
|
|
HOW MANY FUCKIN' TIMES ARE WE GONNA HAVE TO GO THROUGH WITH THIS TOPIC!?!?!?!
|
|
OK
on 2002-04-28 20:07 [#00198286]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker
|
|
how do you came up that radiohead made kid a and manesiac on sonic foundry acid...? ... as far a I know they used cubase for the most of it... and lots of protools.
most of my fav. mus is non-electronic
1.- pre kid a radiohead 2.- pixies 3.- the strokes 4.- tool 5.- pink floyd 6.- portishead 7.- led zeppelin 8.- old metallica 9.- the doors 10.-the ataris 11.- pavement 12.- ben harper 13.- afi 14.- sigur ros 15.- clinic 16.- mogwai 17.- dEUS 18.-at the drive in 19.- faith no more 20.- mano negra 21.- modest mouse 22.- nick drake 23.- pearl jam 24.- R.E.M. 25.- rancid 26.- propagandhi 27.- beck 28.- dave matthews band 29.- white stripes 30.- jimi hendrix 31.- the beatles 32.- the smiths 33.- talking heads 34.- the clash 35......
and i could go on.... the band above are not in any particular order...
and i just realized that i like many of this bands more than any electronic artist out there.
so electronic music kinda sucks
|
|
OK
on 2002-04-28 20:13 [#00198308]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker
|
|
and for christ sake... pink floyd had one keyboard player.. and that's the only synth... you telleing me that they relyied on that synth...
the wall album.. it's astright rocks records
|
|
OK
on 2002-04-28 20:18 [#00198323]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker
|
|
i apologize for my disability to type
|
|
Spookyluke
from United States on 2002-04-28 20:41 [#00198367]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker
|
|
I like The Cure and Bauhaus and Tori and Smashing Pumpkins and all of them use electronics in moderation.
|
|
wayout
from the street of crocodiles on 2002-04-29 01:41 [#00198762]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker
|
|
hmm...pretty much all the artists i like use electronics to some degree...
even the jazz and classical artists i guess i really like when artists mix electronics with non-electronics ...like radiohead, bjork, tortoise, sigur ros, portishead, four tet, aphex, squarepuhser, amon tobin, etc...
|
|
flea
from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-04-29 01:58 [#00198767]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular
|
|
in no particular order
1.Parliament Funkadelic 2.Einsturzende Neubauten (the earlier stuff) 3.SWANS 4.Lydia Lunch 5.The Jesus Lizard 6.Scartch Acid 7.Terminal Cheesecake 8.John Zorn 9.GOD 10.Ox Bow 11.Rapeman 12.Tad (early stuff) 13.Boredoms 14.Tom Waits 15.COWS 16.Helmet 17.Steel Pole Bathtub 18.Butthole Surfers 19.Pussy Galore
|
|
Messageboard index
|