 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)belb ...and 79 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2609095 Today 4 Topics 127242 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I dunno about the rest of you guys but im missing Siskel and Ebert a lot lately. and Ebert and Roeper, to a lesser extent. currently enjoying watching them take a dump all over 1996 with thier list. I am happy to still have redlettermedia, at least. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Yeah they were good and old school Lol@Epic!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i (still) read every Ebert review of any movie i see |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
case in point: i rewatched Forrest Gump just now while 's piece is just a pretty terrible home video advertorial (should be mentioned Ebert is passed away, but the reviews on the site are worth your time) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i mean: the new reviews are good, too https://www.rogerebert.com/ |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Ebert was so good man. No agendas, no cynicism. Always clear and thoughtful. He definitely had his preferences but still remained objective. I shot him a short email in like 2007 about Lynch's Inland Empire and he sent me a nice little reply. He never did get around to reviewing it though, was already sick at that point. Never did agree with many of his takes on Lynch, but his POV was always interesting. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
