MB BANS | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 278 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613474
Today 12
Topics 127502
  
 
Messageboard index
MB BANS
 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2007-05-13 17:36 [#02083538]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #02083535



I think that it is a B8


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2007-05-13 17:37 [#02083539]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to Taxidermist: #02083538



cheers


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-05-13 17:37 [#02083540]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #02083536



"Intellectual Property" - the funniest term to have ever
been invented by Lawyers to squeeze money out of the
bloodless stone.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2007-05-13 17:37 [#02083541]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #02083537



more like customers than stock holders


 

offline johnl from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-05-13 17:38 [#02083542]
Points: 172 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02083518



Marlowe:
Elitism, tempting as it seems, is a choice of the moribund.
By its very nature, it restricts growth and expansion, to
the extent that it brings about its own demise.
It's good while it lasts, but the crash hurts.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-05-13 17:39 [#02083543]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #02083541



OK, but customers have rights in the marketplace - does it
extend to the Intellectual Property of the Xltronic Forum?

After all, every business knows that it's nothing without
its customers.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-05-13 17:40 [#02083544]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to johnl: #02083542



I know, John - my tongue was in my chéék when I made that
suggestion :]


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2007-05-13 17:43 [#02083545]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02083537



No, its a donation.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2007-05-13 17:43 [#02083546]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #02083543



Customers have rights, but no right to control the company.
They get to vote with their feet. If people don't like it
here, go somewhere else. The proprietor chooses how to run
the company.......... he might run it well (in your opinion)
or he might run it poorly (again, in your opinion)..... the
market will decide.



 

offline johnl from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-05-13 17:46 [#02083547]
Points: 172 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02083544



:)
Careless Talk Costs Lives!


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-05-13 17:47 [#02083548]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #02083546



True, maybe not overt control but if a company isn't
satisfying its clientèle and is forced to make changes,
then the customers (or former customers!) have exercised
control over policy.

Also, I've noticed quite a few members saying this board is
dying, so maybe you're saying that reflects on the site's
owner and moderators?


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2007-05-13 17:47 [#02083549]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02083540



Insofar as the intellectual property comment, this is
something he has come up with. It belongs to him and those
that helped code and develop it. Its something that he did
to help further the community, but its also his site. If he
wanted to close it down today he not under any kind of
obligation to answer to anyone for it. This is just the
nature of the internet.


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-05-13 17:50 [#02083550]
Points: 4884 Status: Regular



Ezkerraldean never seemed so bad to me, so it's sad to see
him go....

But I'm glad as hell The_Shark isn't going to be fucking up
every thread that's posted here anymore.

For Future Trolls: If you're going to be a troll, at least
be a FUNNY one, please (see example- w M w). All these
trolls (save Ezkerraldean) were basically posting worthless
crap everywhere.


 

offline johnl from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-05-13 17:50 [#02083551]
Points: 172 Status: Lurker



In most jurisdictions, each individual's utterances here
would belong to them and them alone, unless they had signed
over (or clicked Agree, though that is very questionable...)
said rights to the owner of the medium (in this case, the
medium is the message-board). Most copyright systems allow
for innate ownership.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-05-13 17:51 [#02083553]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #02083549



No-one's arguing against it being his site and that he has
the tools to close the place down.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2007-05-13 17:52 [#02083554]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #02083548



Thats right...... some long term members have left and many
people are decrying the state the board is in.

I for one don't think it's much different, and I think
things will continue on as they have.

What this board needs is SAW III, a new AE double album (one
"Incunubula II" and one "fucked-up beats '07) and BOC to
split up and release solo LP's.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-05-13 17:53 [#02083555]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to Wolfslice: #02083550



Dan was one of the most incisively witty posters here - part
of a long great tradition of British wits who are generally
poorly received by less intellectually endowed peoples.


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2007-05-13 17:56 [#02083557]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



wedding dj.
we only do weddings and we do them well !


 

offline johnl from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-05-13 18:03 [#02083559]
Points: 172 Status: Lurker



Aengus, as usual, was just too far into left-field to be
appreciated.
Dan was amazing, and his banning leaves precious little wit
on this board.


 

offline johnl from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-05-13 18:04 [#02083561]
Points: 172 Status: Lurker



Forgot to say that dog_belch was the best thing about XLT.


 

offline oyvinto on 2007-05-13 18:05 [#02083562]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Followup to johnl: #02083561 | Show recordbag



yeah, but he's not banned either is he?


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2007-05-13 18:06 [#02083563]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to johnl: #02083561



Dan was a giant of a man


 

offline johnl from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-05-13 18:09 [#02083564]
Points: 172 Status: Lurker



Is.
The dream lives on.

But the_shark, dog_belch and gay_dad are all banned, as far
as I know.


 

offline oyvinto on 2007-05-13 18:15 [#02083565]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



his profile exists at least, so he's not b8'ed
LAZY_TIT


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2007-05-13 18:16 [#02083566]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



What the hell? Is Dan gone? or just for a week..
If he's gone, there goes xlt.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-05-13 18:21 [#02083568]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #02083566



He's been master b8ed


 

offline oyvinto on 2007-05-13 18:23 [#02083569]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02083568 | Show recordbag



b9?


 

offline johnl from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-05-13 18:29 [#02083570]
Points: 172 Status: Lurker



I think it's pretty safe I'll only read XLT rarely in
future, if at all, after this.


 

offline johnl from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-05-13 18:29 [#02083571]
Points: 172 Status: Lurker



*pretty safe to say
...


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2007-05-13 18:37 [#02083572]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02083553



Yes. But you were arguing that it was wrong for him to ban
these people. I said its his site, and that he has a right
to choose who can and cannot post on it. You were saying
that we as customers deserve the right not to be banned. I
was saying no.

Even if you do pay the $10, it doesn't entitle you to stink
the place up.

That said, a lot of those people who seemed to have been
banned weren't that bad.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-05-13 18:41 [#02083573]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #02083572



I've forgotten what I said - I'm sure it was a question
rather than a statement though.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2007-05-13 18:43 [#02083574]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02083568



do you know what for?


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-05-13 18:52 [#02083575]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #02083574



For being a Caustic Window, i imagine :]


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2007-05-13 19:44 [#02083587]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02083575



:[


 

offline uviol from United States on 2007-05-13 20:06 [#02083588]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



Of course Phobia's well within his rights to ban any and
everyone on this board. Whether it will gain him any
popularity from the rest of the members is another matter.
A board's only as good as its members, and I think a lot of
thought needs to go into a perm ban. In my estimation
'annoyance' is not grounds for a ban of any sort. Trolling
is.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2007-05-13 21:56 [#02083590]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I keep misreading this thread title as MR BANS and picturing
a small dog like a Yorkie with mod privileges.

Ooooo, who's a cute little moderator? Yes you are, yes you
are, Mr. Bans!


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2007-05-13 22:12 [#02083591]
Points: 14292 Status: Lurker



just when i was going to remove xlt from my bookmarks
forever...


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2007-05-14 01:41 [#02083616]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to mappatazee: #02083591



so fucking dramatic, i could puke.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2007-05-14 02:04 [#02083622]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



phobs isnt around this messageboard enough to know what
members are actually essential. essential is the only word i
can think of. dog_belch and redrum were essential,
regardless of how they acted.


 

offline pigster from melbs on 2007-05-14 02:06 [#02083623]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker



dog belch isnt baned is he?


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2007-05-14 02:11 [#02083625]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #02083622



what a bunch of crap. an old depraved man hiding away in
chile and a childish irishman is the last thing we need.


 

offline mortsto-x from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2007-05-14 02:32 [#02083633]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #02083622



Agreed. If we want to maintain the agressive and bitter
atmosphere that has been here lately, that is.


 

offline It_is_a_beaver_ from Happy Land! (United States) on 2007-05-14 02:36 [#02083635]
Points: 94 Status: Regular



Thank you, Phobiazero. I think I will feel safer posting
here about electronic music now. There were a lot of mean
people here that talked bad to me and posted nasty pictures
that are not good for kids to see.

Thanks!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-05-14 02:37 [#02083636]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



In keeping with the topic, I just banned gazman.


 

offline nesukayh from Kildare on 2007-05-14 03:41 [#02083644]
Points: 55 Status: Addict | Followup to Ceri JC: #02083636



ceri, remember the purple pants generator ? :P
oh those were the days of days...


 

offline Phobiazero from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2007-05-14 03:51 [#02083648]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #02083622 | Show recordbag



perhaps this will give other members a chance to become
essential.




 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-05-14 03:56 [#02083649]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to nesukayh: #02083644 | Show recordbag



I don't remember the generator, no? That picture and the
track of the same name (soon to be available on We are Not
People, allegedly), however, I do recall.


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2007-05-14 05:04 [#02083670]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to nesukayh: #02083644



so you're a dupe aswell?


 

offline nacmat on 2007-05-14 05:38 [#02083674]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



I say ban mourinho

mourinho hahahahahhaha


 

offline xceque on 2007-05-14 05:48 [#02083675]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Followup to nacmat: #02083674 | Show recordbag



yes

and YES!

I was getting so sick of this place, but since no-one was
actually doing anything wrong I didn't feel that justified
in banning anyone. After a while I didn't see the point in
coming, just to get pissed off.


 


Messageboard index