Lolita | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 309 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613471
Today 9
Topics 127501
  
 
Messageboard index
Lolita
 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-26 22:45 [#00326324]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



Just as this was brought up last time, I heard on Bravo!
that the Stanley Kubrick version of it will be shown tonight
at 9 or so. its the old black and white one from like the
50s. I don't know if i'll get the chance to see it...or
wanna see it.


 

offline outside_ninja from ninjaland (I touch no-one and on 2002-07-26 22:49 [#00326330]
Points: 462 Status: Addict



I have it on video - very good film. If you are a fan of
Peter Sellars, he is in it. The book also is very excellent.


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-26 22:50 [#00326334]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



theres no nudity in that version (old 50's one) is there?


 

offline outside_ninja from ninjaland (I touch no-one and on 2002-07-26 22:54 [#00326340]
Points: 462 Status: Addict | Followup to Amonbrune: #00326334



Are you interested in naked pictures of children?


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-26 22:56 [#00326344]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



no. i just didn't think there would be any considering it
was the 50s. im thankful for that.


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-26 22:56 [#00326345]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



if there is id be awfulling surprised


 

offline outside_ninja from ninjaland (I touch no-one and on 2002-07-26 23:00 [#00326353]
Points: 462 Status: Addict



No nudity, and Lolita looks about 18


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-26 23:02 [#00326357]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



thats what i would think...50s wouldn't allow it.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2002-07-26 23:45 [#00326373]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Amonbrune: #00326357



so let's get this straight, you're not into children?


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-26 23:47 [#00326374]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



nope im not


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2002-07-26 23:49 [#00326377]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Amonbrune: #00326374



And....

you don't like children full stop!


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 00:11 [#00326401]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



why are you asking me all these questions anyway? i mean i
like children but in a good way... O_o


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2002-07-27 00:14 [#00326405]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular



What do you consider...

'I like children in a good way'?

Sorry, I'm only kidding.......

I'm just having fun!


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 00:21 [#00326413]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



lol liking them in a good way...being fun and doing things
with them.

its just that with this movie it has to be one of the most
tragic stories. i mean all the characters get hurt. the
mother dies...and the others spiral down. its a sad story
of utter chaos.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-07-27 00:27 [#00326431]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to Amonbrune: #00326324 | Show recordbag



It's obvious that you're a pedophile. I'm calling the cops,
I suggest you leave town if you know what's good for you,
you sick sick man.


 

offline Dozier from United States on 2002-07-27 00:31 [#00326436]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker



It's not on my Bravo. WTF!?


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2002-07-27 00:32 [#00326438]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Amonbrune: #00326413



It's a beautifull and tragic story! I was just being silly.
If you haven't read Stanley Kubricks biography I think
youl'd enjoy it, he was such a perfectionist with humour +
controlfreakism (?). It's a brilliant story and so well
told.


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2002-07-27 01:12 [#00326516]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker



do yourself a favor and don't type it into your search
engine


 

offline steve from chicago on 2002-07-27 01:23 [#00326531]
Points: 1156 Status: Lurker



I was eyeballing Lolita at the bookstore yesterday, walked
out with some Nietzsche instead.


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 01:26 [#00326536]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



Ophecks: ahh...this town ain't big enough for the both of
us...DRAW!


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 01:26 [#00326538]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



Jivver: "Controlfreakism" thats very well said.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-07-27 01:27 [#00326541]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



I dont like children in good way or bad..
maybe because I am envious of them..
maybe because I wanna be one of them and feel like goin..
hey quit hogging the play doh spaghetti making machine
thingy pass the apple juice and turn up the Sesame Street
you spoilt brat..


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 01:38 [#00326548]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



Dozier: thats probably cause the movie is on Canadian Bravo!
.. im guessing. check again or something.


 

offline Dozier from United States on 2002-07-27 01:51 [#00326551]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker | Followup to Amonbrune: #00326548



Damn. I did some searching and it is a different Bravo than
what we have in the US. And there's also a different Bravo
in the UK. And they both seem better than mine!


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 04:57 [#00326644]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



haha...Canadian Bravo! is just mo betta.


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 04:58 [#00326645]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



our 'Bravo' does have an '!' at the end...


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-07-27 04:59 [#00326647]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



I watched a few minutes of it...


 

offline Resident Evil from heat some coffee, mmm, mmm (Australia) on 2002-07-27 04:59 [#00326648]
Points: 1643 Status: Lurker



Lolita is one of my Kubrick faves. Everything about it is
near perfect. Must see classic. Haven't seen the 1997 (?)
version, is it any good? Any opinions from people that have
seen both films?

Ooh! This is a milestone post for me (1000th)! Seems rather
fitting since Kubrick is my favourite director!

I'd like to thank god and my parents for getting me to where
I am today :) Aphex Always=D


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-07-27 05:14 [#00326662]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I watched the whole thing! I want a Lolita when I grow up.
This, I command!


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 05:24 [#00326677]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



I saw practically the whole thing. I missed the very
beginning. the show had not very much to do with sex and
for that Im grateful. I do recommend this movie to
ANYONE...its just a sad story of love gone awry.

Ive not seen the 97 or whatever version. ive looked it up
and apparently does have sex scenes and nudity...the 60s
version does not. no sex whatsoever.


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 05:25 [#00326678]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



settle down Ophecks ;) WINK


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 05:26 [#00326680]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



You can learn more about the 97 -98 version here...pictures
and what have you. its a page based on Dominique
Swain...the girl that played the part of Lolita.

http://www.dominiqueswain.org/

check it out


 

offline Resident Evil from heat some coffee, mmm, mmm (Australia) on 2002-07-27 05:31 [#00326683]
Points: 1643 Status: Lurker



Thats a cool link Amon, I'm currently checking it out.


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 05:31 [#00326684]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



thanks


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-07-27 05:33 [#00326687]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



yeah, Jeremy Irons is in the newer Lolita is he not?

Do you know what is an anagram of Jeremy Irons? Jeremy's
Iron!!

PS: That's a simpsons reference for those who didn't
understand... :)


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 05:35 [#00326691]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



Jeremy Irons? who's he?


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 05:36 [#00326693]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



oh..in the movie? im not sure. maybe


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 05:36 [#00326694]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



check the link to find out Funkmaster. it explains the new
version


 

offline Dozier from United States on 2002-07-27 06:50 [#00326788]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker



Jeremy Irons was the bad guy in the third Die Hard movie,
and he was the main bad guy in Dungeons & Dragons (haha), as
well as many other things! Good actor.



 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-07-27 07:18 [#00326796]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



did you get my email Dozier?


 


Messageboard index