Global Warming / UK weather | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
dariusgriffin
big
...and 262 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613470
Today 8
Topics 127501
  
 
Messageboard index
Global Warming / UK weather
 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2002-07-23 09:40 [#00320978]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



The weather in the UK this summer has been fucking
appalling, particularly up here in the North. We've had a
LOT of rain, very little sunshine and it has been really
quite cold. I'm often having to wear a hat and sweatshirt,
and it's fucking July, man!

Every year, the weather seems to become stranger. We're
always hearing on the TV that some record has been broken,
like "this was the wettest April on record" or whatever.
Most experts agree that we have entered a period of climate
change. And many agree that this has been caused or at
least precipitated by global warming, brought about as a
result of human activities. I did a degree in Environmental
Science, so I've learnt about all this!

Parts of the world will become warmer and drier, others will
become wetter and colder. What we are experiencing in the
UK is a greater homogeneity in weather conditions between
the seasons: i.e. warmer, wetter winters, and colder, wetter
summers. Rainfall is increasing. I mean, look at all these
floods that keep happening in the Autumn in the UK.

The increase in rainfall is probably caused by an increase
in water in the atmosphere brought about as a result of the
melting of the polar ice caps. This obviously results in an
increase in precipitation and cloud cover - more clouds in
winter = warmer, wetter weather. More cloud cover in summer
= colder, wetter weather. It means we don't get a proper
summer or winter anymore. It's never that cold for very
long, and it's never that warm for very long. And it's
certainly never dry for all that long.

They predict that the situation is going to escalate and get
a lot worse.

Shite. And it's even more worrying when major polluters
like the USA rubbish the global warming theory, pull out of
the Kyoto Protocol and vow to continue polluting.

Other parts of the world are becoming extremely hot and dry,
resulting in desertification and thus a reduction in fertile
land. The whole situation is really worrying, and those of
us in the selfish West sh


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2002-07-23 09:41 [#00320980]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



Other parts of the world are becoming extremely hot and dry,
resulting in desertification and thus a reduction in fertile
land. The whole situation is really worrying, and those of
us in the selfish West should do our bit to help reduce it.

DON'T drive/buy cars when you don't need to. RECYCLE.
BOYCOTT companies that don't carry environmentally friendly
products. VOTE for parties with a good environmental
agenda. AMERICANS - get BUSH to see SENSE.

I can't believe how few people take environmental issues
seriously. The environment is what we LIVE in. If we don't
look after it, then we shoot ourselves in the foot.

So take action! And tell others to do the same!

Otherwise, basically, we are going to be pretty fucked.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-07-23 09:42 [#00320981]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



That's the spirit, lad.


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2002-07-23 09:44 [#00320982]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



Thanks Meho. Are you serious or sarcastic?

What are your thoughts on the subject?


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-07-23 09:49 [#00320983]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



I am serious. I mean, I am a bit sarcastic every time
someone "discovers" that our environment is being degraded/
fucked up because of capitalism and offers boycott as an
answer because I've seen so much of it being a part of the
punk scene etc. But in essence, I support your opinion.
Capitalism is the sole reason our planet is being destroyed.
It should be stopped.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-23 09:53 [#00320985]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



The weather here is particularly bad this year.


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2002-07-23 09:54 [#00320987]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



Cool man.

Obviously, it's something that annoying hippies seem to
rattle on about rather too often. But, as I said before, I
can't believe how few otherwise sensible and intelligent
people seem to take environmental issues seriously.

I think it boils down to a "it won't happen in my lifetime"
attitude, which in itself is selfish and frankly disgusting.
But it's also incorrect, because environmental degradation
is occurring all around us all of the time.

And, unless serious action is taken, this global warming
thing is going to seriously FUCK people's lives up in the
coming decades. Mark my words......


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2002-07-23 09:57 [#00320990]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



And it's not just about having a crap, wet summer. In
developing countries, agricultural systems will be so badly
affected by climate change that huge famine is likely to
occur, on a scale never seen before.

And of course, rising sea-levels are going to leave millions
or billions without homes. The world is already
overpopulated, imagine what it will be like when there is
even less land to live on!


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-07-23 09:58 [#00320991]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



In essence, nothing will be changed util capitalism is
stopped. Meaning probably never.


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-23 10:11 [#00320999]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker



And you all know it's gonna be lush in January....... Mother
Nature's been shooting up with our pollution and it wasn't
outta choice.... shes fucked in the head now, like having
Ozzy Osbourne control our weather system..... grrr


 

offline smokehammer from Saigon (Vietnam) on 2002-07-23 10:41 [#00321016]
Points: 1463 Status: Lurker



good topic :)
I have also studied climate change, manic .
politicians tend to operate on the basis>
only take any action if>

1) it benefits big business
2) it saves/generates money short/medium term
3) 90%+ of the public are *demanding* change

seeing as 1) and 2) are not going result from stopping dirty
fossil fuel emissions and the like; 3) is the only option,
and as usual most people bury their heads in the sand.

Unfortunately, it seems most people will argue that its GOOD
that we get more cloud, because then we're less likely to
get skin cancer as a result of the reducing ozone-layer.....
:/

most people seem to genuinely enjoy justifying and
reinforcing ignorance , it almost sounds 'clever'. And they
use one impending calamity (like global warming) to justify
accelerating our disregard for the planet.
"Our planet is fucking up; so lets get what we can out of it
before its too late".. instead of actually taking
responsibility.
The US is still the biggest sulphur emitter in the world.
Drax in Britain pumps out more than the WHOLE of
Scandinavia. What a bunch of sick bastards we all are (I
take personal responsibility and I think more of us should
!!!)


 

offline flim-flam from In a cupboard, in the kitchen. (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-23 10:43 [#00321019]
Points: 751 Status: Lurker



The weather here in Swansea-land has been warm and sunny up
until today.....now it's wankin down!!!


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2002-07-23 12:08 [#00321085]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



I want to hear the opinion of an American board-member on
this topic.

Despite the UK being a terrible polluter, a reasonable
proportion of British people appear to be environmentally
aware (although few are actually prepared to do anything
about it). I wonder if America is the same?


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2002-07-23 12:10 [#00321088]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker



I think they're a bit more active on it in the US

It's either US or Oz where they have seperate bins for the
dustmen for trash and stuff for recycling.

Most things are cfc free now too, it's those damn farts that
do it !!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-23 12:18 [#00321089]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to pOgO: #00321088 | Show recordbag



They're introducing the seperate bin thing here too- they're
talking about charging people for bin bags of "normal"
rubbish, but recycling for free, to encourage more people to
recycle. Whilst I think it's a good idea, I can see a lot of
fly tipping resulting from it...


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-23 12:23 [#00321090]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00321089



Well we have a black box for bottles and papers.... that's
been going on where I live for about a year now.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-07-23 12:26 [#00321092]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



That's really nice, but won't do much good. The industry is
the biggest pollution-producer and I don't see it slowing
down.


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2002-07-23 12:35 [#00321096]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00321092



yeah, I can;t see any power plants having a seperate bin for
toxic waste and stuff !!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-23 12:38 [#00321098]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00321092 | Show recordbag



Yeah, it's like water conservation- all well and good, but
farming & industry use 90%+ of it. Even if people halved the
amount they used there would be 95% still used...


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-07-23 12:41 [#00321100]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



fucking NYC

they are suspending plastic and bottle recycling for a year
(or so they say) because it cost too much

well fucking A, yeah lets just not care about the
reprecutions shall we?

everytime i throw a bottle in the trash it kills me


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2002-07-23 12:45 [#00321103]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker



do you come back to life again if all the children clap
they're hands?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-23 12:50 [#00321106]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Let's all make a BoC style track about it and send it to our
respective governments :)


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-07-23 12:51 [#00321107]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00320991



Typical commie nonsense from Meho. It doesn't really matter
in the big scheme of things. Why should we inhabit the
Earth? Why is human existence necessary? It ain't.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-07-23 12:55 [#00321113]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to jonesy: #00321107



Who said anything about humans? There are animals here that
I love more than humans...


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2002-07-23 12:57 [#00321116]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00321107



anyway, while I'm here, I'd like to live somwhere clean


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-07-23 12:59 [#00321118]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Anyway, good to see you here bitch. I'm leaving for that
meeting now, catch you later.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-07-23 13:05 [#00321128]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00321118



See you later.

Death to the whales and seal cubs!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-23 13:08 [#00321134]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jonesy: #00321107 | Show recordbag



You love animals? You sick man ;)

Good to see you. I think it's arrogant the way people think
that humans are different to any other species- monkeys
would have have pollution making labour saving devices if
they were smart enough...


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2002-07-23 13:09 [#00321136]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00321134



I think they already do, there's a chimp in a suit somwhere
smoking a cigar and raking it in


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-23 13:56 [#00321192]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992575


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-23 14:07 [#00321202]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



jonesy's right.
The best environmetal contribution one can make is to kill
yourself. Even better take a few thousand people out with
you.

It's like we're seeing the beginning of Earth's self-healing
process... water levels will rise causing apocalyptic
drowning, deserts will vastly expand causing apocalyptic
famine.
Net result is that the cause of the problem ,Man, is largely
removed.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-23 14:09 [#00321205]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Loogie: #00321202 | Show recordbag



Yep. We will all be killed off and ants will inherit the
earth.


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-23 14:14 [#00321209]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



and the fucking fucking FUCKING MOST frustrating thing about
it all is.... I CAN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

sure I can recycle my rubbish but lets face it....

OK, a contraversial thing to say here: why don't third world
countries STAY third world.... when they turn into
DEVELOPING countries they become the worst poluters of all.


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-07-23 14:30 [#00321217]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker



Recycling is fine, but it requires even more energy. It's
better to live more simply and reduce consumption. Ophecks
is a good example of this with his refusal to buy more CDs.
:-)


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2002-07-23 14:34 [#00321219]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker | Followup to Inverted Whale: #00321217



Ophecks on a mission to save the world =oD


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-23 14:34 [#00321220]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



Another contravertial suggestion:

No family on the planet allowed more than 2 children.

Sorry Catholics.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-23 14:36 [#00321222]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Loogie: #00321220 | Show recordbag



No family allowed more than 1 perhaps, a la china. Yes, I
know this means I wouldn't have been born :)


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2002-07-23 15:10 [#00321242]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



It would indeed be a good idea if family's were only allowed
one or two children. Overpopulation is our main problem.
There are far too many people in the world and we can't
sustain exponential population growth for much longer.

We should genetically modify people so they can only produce
one or two kids.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-07-23 15:11 [#00321244]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



I am all for that, in fact, no families should be allowed to
have children at all. And, what Loogie said about 3rd world
countries: not only they should reject the idea of
"industrial development = social progress" but the
"post-industrial " countries should also be made to drop
that capitalist crap and return to "simple" lifestyle,
production-style and all. It would be discriminative to just
tell 3rd world countries that they should restrain
themselves from technological development. Unfortunately,
the nature of capital inevitably pushes the development of
technologies based on the best resource/ income rate rather
than on environment/ people/ nature freindly basis.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-07-23 15:17 [#00321247]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to manicminer: #00321242



BTW, on that "overpopulation" issue: have any of you thought
about the fact that in countries with largest population
growth they spend the least money per capita and vice versa.
It's the natural mechanism: the poor reproduce much in order
to meet high death rates and the fact that their main
economy resource is cheap labour. So, if "the west" would
like to solve this problem, they should rather re-direct
part of their wealth in order to increase standard of living
in third world countries instead of trying to set population
control programs that appeal to these people to have less
children. It's hypocritical and racist.


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-23 15:29 [#00321253]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



Interesting points Meho...
I am not particularly satisfied with capitalism, but if it
wasn't for capitalism we wouldn't be having this
conversation on computers. Without capitalism there is no
motivation.

But who needs the luxuries that it brings...

I don't know either is you can put high breeding rate down
to high death rate.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-07-23 15:29 [#00321254]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Bloody hell, listen to me, I sound like a real commie pinko
faggot, don't I?


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-07-23 15:32 [#00321255]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



Oh dear, Meho is still pumping out his liberal crap.

Anyone seen the film Naked by mike Leigh? Check the spiel by
Johnny in that film. He basically says that we're a minor
blip on the devlopment of the universe. We don't matter.


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-23 15:36 [#00321257]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



and in the Matrix the Agent says humans are like a disease:
they move to an area, overpopulate it and move onto another
area...


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-07-23 15:37 [#00321258]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to Loogie: #00321253



Loogie: yes you can. That's one of the oldest natural
mechanisms: high death rates/ vulnerability of young
specimens always account for high birth rates. Even in micro
systems: in Serbia where I live, more developed parts have
negative population growth as opposed to underdeveloped
ones.

On the capitalism issue: I don't really care for the
internet, CD's, computer games, TV shows etc. I mean, all
those things make my life more, er, fun, but I do not
consider them essential. It's just that I'm used to them,
but I don't rate them higher than living a simple life of,
say having a piece of land you work hard on, having folk
songs and myths and rituals that consist a living culture
(as opposed to dead "traditional" culture) and having a
religion that actually you practice every time at every
place. The fact that I' d find it extremely hard to get used
to this lifestyle/ culture is not important, I know that
it's healthier for the environment and society in general,
so I am not going to rate my personal preferences above
reason/ logic/ whatever.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-07-23 15:39 [#00321261]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



If somebody were to ask me which was my most favourite book
in the Bible, I would always answer, the gospel of John.
It’s so full of light that it is almost blinding. John
tells us at the outset that Jesus came to lighten our
darkness. He proclaimed Himself as the Light of the World!
He wasn’t talking about simply brightening up our days.
His light revealed our dark lives and habits - Our
sinfulness and showed us for what we are- Sinners! And that
same light, through His Word lit up the pathway to our
salvation through His atoning sacrifice. When we read in
Matthew 5, how the Lord says to us, ‘Let your light so
shine before men, that they may see your good works and
glorify your Father who is in heaven' (NKJV). What is He
saying? Well, He is NOT telling us to stand before our
colleagues to flaunt the way in which we work better then
they do! No! He is saying that our lifestyle, our visible
witness should be such that it stands our like the bright
light on a hill. People should simply be able to see the
difference. In that way our lives testify to our
relationship with God, through our Lord Jesus. I remember
once watching children on a school stage perform a play.
Suddenly the lights went out and there was a noise and you
could just see one of the boys going across the stage, he
quite clearly hit another boy and ran quietly back to his
place, when the light came on, everybody was where they had
been a few seconds earlier when the lights went out, but one
boy had a bleeding nose and a tearful face! The light
revealed the problem! The lad who had done the hitting was
looking sheepish and had a face that was flushed red with
embarrassment! The light revealed the truth! We are in the
world, to witness to the new life that we have in Christ
Jesus and through life demonstrate to others the love, grace
and truth that this new life brings.



 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-07-23 15:41 [#00321265]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Holy shit I am slow.

Jonesy: what are you doing online, bitch? Another lunch
break. I am writing a message to you right this moment.

Loogie: that matrix quote is not entirely true. Only
industrial societies actually destroy environments beyond
(reasonably fast) repair and have to move to other
teritories. Pre-industrial societies might not have been
heaven, but their impact on the environment was balanced
with nature's ability to compensate.


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-23 15:41 [#00321266]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



you're right! I am becoming Amish immediately!

no seriously what you said holds true. We don't need the
things we live with and take for granted... if you don't
know about about it you can't miss it...
I'm sure a tribesman in Africa has the same amount of joy in
life as we do.

But I couldn't NOT live without my dishwasher! :)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-23 15:43 [#00321269]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jonesy: #00321261 | Show recordbag



Erm, have you reverted to catholicism?


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-23 15:45 [#00321274]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



no i've become amish (is that how you spell it?)
but with a dishwasher.


 


Messageboard index