Winamp3 | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 87 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613498
Today 24
Topics 127504
  
 
Messageboard index
Winamp3
 

offline Laqeuro from New York City (United States) on 2002-09-05 07:53 [#00379850]
Points: 3167 Status: Regular



Is friggin' awful

avoid this atrocity(sp?) at all costs

 

offline Murray from Southend, Essex (United Kingdom) on 2002-09-05 08:03 [#00379853]
Points: 4891 Status: Lurker



I know, it sucks, no where near as good as the Winamp 2
version


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-09-05 08:15 [#00379858]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



Yeah, its got some serious system resource hoggin problems!

 

offline SteveWardale from Lincoln (United Kingdom) on 2002-09-05 08:17 [#00379860]
Points: 532 Status: Regular



Not only is the EQ dancin' thing is jerky, but the sound is
muffled.


 

offline aron from saskatoon (Canada) on 2002-09-05 08:31 [#00379867]
Points: 3756 Status: Lurker



and it sucks too :)

 

offline Clic on 2002-09-05 08:35 [#00379869]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular



I had the beta version for approximately 10 minutes.

I'm not even going to acknowledge the fact that the
completed version is available.


 

offline map from mülligen (Switzerland) on 2002-09-05 09:04 [#00379883]
Points: 3408 Status: Lurker



2.79 is the most useful version

 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2002-09-05 09:57 [#00379936]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



what is so bad about it?? ive seen it on a mates computer,
but ive not actually used it properly yet.


 

offline brendan from Adelaide (Australia) on 2002-09-05 10:04 [#00379938]
Points: 157 Status: Regular



It tries to do too much i think. Like, the reason it was so
popular was because it was light and compact. Then they
turned it into a big heavy piece of shit, like Windows Media
Player. It's good how they left a choice to download the
classic player and skins though.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2002-09-05 10:06 [#00379942]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



so is it another case of bloatware strikes again???

 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-09-05 10:15 [#00379950]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



For a V3 it feels like a V1 ... it just feels too clunky &
slow...

I'm gonna stick with 2.x ...never had any problems with that
& does everything I need....

A big pity really...as I liked the look of some of the new
features; perhaps in a years time it'll feel a bit more
complete....


 

offline hungrig from Sweden on 2002-09-05 12:14 [#00380069]
Points: 692 Status: Lurker



way too slow for my taste.

 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-09-05 14:59 [#00380303]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



I know I just swapped my 2.79 with a 3.0 and am regretting
it..can you say BLOATWARE!!


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-09-05 19:01 [#00380690]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker



There are a couple reasons to upgrade past 2.79 to 2.81.

You get ogg vorbis playback built in, and the new gapless,
crossfading output plugin is pretty cool and more flexible
than before.

But you can always add these new plugins to 2.79 by hand.

 

Messageboard index