dude makes short movie | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 262 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613471
Today 9
Topics 127501
  
 
Messageboard index
dude makes short movie
 

offline yoyoyoyo from Sweden on 2009-12-26 10:12 [#02354794]
Points: 3200 Status: Regular



and puts it on youtube then hollywood rang him down after
almost 5 million views.it costed him 300 dollars to make it.
afterwards he signed up with Sam Raimi, the director of the
3 Spiderman movies, Evil Dead etc. and his Ghost House
Productions. The guy was like "I loved what you did
with 300 dollars, let's see what you can do with 30
million". Federico will shoot the Hollywood movie next year
in Uruguay and Argentina, and it's gonna be in theaters in
2012.

LAZY_TITLE


 

offline Steinvordhosbn from London (United Kingdom) on 2009-12-26 10:21 [#02354797]
Points: 3185 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Thanks to enjoying access to most of the major global news
outlets, I and many others were privileged enough to hear
about this when it was still actually news.

Didn't this BULLSHIT appear suspiciously close to the minute
YouTube said they're thinking about charging? Hey young
directors hellbent on making films identical to shit
Hollywood blockbusters, but cheaper. Pay to whore your
questionable talent online and we could all win (everyone
other than film lovers)


 

offline yoyoyoyo from Sweden on 2009-12-26 10:51 [#02354813]
Points: 3200 Status: Regular | Followup to Steinvordhosbn: #02354797



is the girl in your avatar girlfreind material?

and yes hollywood suck mostly


 

offline nunn from Vatican City State (Holy See) on 2009-12-26 14:44 [#02354866]
Points: 96 Status: Addict



I'm really under-impressed. While that took a lot of skilled
work, it was all in really bad taste; the robots design was
stupid and the editing was really lame. Can't wait for
everyone to start retarding on me.


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-26 14:54 [#02354867]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker



eye candy


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2009-12-26 15:31 [#02354874]
Points: 12394 Status: Regular



I'm not sure how throwing a ton of money at him is going to
improve the quality of his advert-like films.

I've made a better film about robots and shit and if I'd
had $300 to make it I'd have used the money to buy a
Playstation or alcohol or something.


 

offline Steinvordhosbn from London (United Kingdom) on 2009-12-26 15:39 [#02354876]
Points: 3185 Status: Regular | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02354874 | Show recordbag



A far superior film, and a chick with a musket!


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-12-26 15:42 [#02354879]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



I was thinking about your dad today.


 

offline b6662966 from ? on 2009-12-26 15:48 [#02354880]
Points: 1110 Status: Lurker



You know I saw this a couple of weeks ago and could not
figure out why people thought it was so amazing?

The fact that it cost him 300 to produce is a bit misleading
and isnt unreasonable. There were no sets, it was lit
naturally and the main characters were cgi, so there were no
costs.

While the cgi was pretty cool (not great) I cant imagine
that Hollywood would give this guy based on his storytelling
abilities, that short film had no story whatsoever.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2009-12-26 15:53 [#02354883]
Points: 12394 Status: Regular



Ah, but Hollywood don't need storytellers, they have
scriptwriters for that. They only need vaguely competent
goons who won't ask too many questions.


 

offline yoyoyoyo from Sweden on 2009-12-26 15:59 [#02354885]
Points: 3200 Status: Regular



what is a hollywood movie excaktly?
is into the wild or the wrestler a hollywood movie?
or maybe even blade runner?


 

offline Steinvordhosbn from London (United Kingdom) on 2009-12-26 16:00 [#02354887]
Points: 3185 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



The only novel thing about that clip is that it has
Montevideo as the backdrop and not New York or Washington
(it couldn't happen in London as you'd be arrested for
committing "hostile reconnaissance"). I look forward to the
$300 billion remake set in New York or Washington.


 

offline freqy on 2009-12-26 16:09 [#02354890]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




how about robots blasting humans for being so stupid?
Blasting them for not building solar deserts to ween
themselves off oil? Or for not feeding the starving
millions. ? at least have some f%=ing meaning !!



 

offline Steinvordhosbn from London (United Kingdom) on 2009-12-26 16:12 [#02354891]
Points: 3185 Status: Regular | Followup to freqy: #02354890 | Show recordbag



How about you blasting yourself into the sun to raise money
for turtle retirement homes?


 

offline big from lsg on 2009-12-26 16:17 [#02354893]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



well the best thing is that it cost that little and that
he's not a professional, you can't really use that
arguments

it did still look pretty good. also it's nice it didn't last
hollywood length. :)


 

offline big from lsg on 2009-12-26 16:33 [#02354900]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Followup to Steinvordhosbn: #02354891 | Show recordbag



there there (turtle retirement homes are a good cause
though)


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2009-12-27 06:05 [#02355014]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker



well there was not real story in there. just robots blowing
stuff up.

but in terms of art direction, the shots, editing,
framing,....
there is definitly potential in there. (in the guy, not the
movie)


 

offline big from lsg on 2009-12-27 06:12 [#02355015]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



the story is robots are coming to wipe us out.


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2009-12-27 10:05 [#02355036]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #02355015



right....


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2009-12-27 10:30 [#02355037]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



yeah I wasn't too impressed either, looks like pretty
standard Michael Bay stuff to me...


 

offline jnasato from 777gogogo (Japan) on 2009-12-27 19:01 [#02355157]
Points: 3393 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I dunno what you're all complaining about, cuz this shit is
impressive. Robots coming and blowing shit up sounds like
no story, but that's sort of the whole point. It works very
well in a short short short film context, but yes, it would
suck for 2 hours straight.

When kamikaze pilots were about to crash into Pearl Harbor,
you think the sailors requested going from 16:9 to 2.39:1,
to get a wider shot of the menacing Japanese planes?

During September 11, who the fuck within 100 feet of that
was immediately requesting a plot? They just ran and
screamed and cried, cuz nobody knew what was going on.

That's the point of this short film. It's terror, with no
explanation. Obviously the robots want everyone dead, so
that is their explanation.

Just crazy ass robots saying FUCK YOU DIE, and then doing
it.

Robots came to kill everybody-- told in 5 minutes. Pretty
solid. It's a tragedy story, and no one but the unknown
enemy wins.

However, had I done it, I'd probably have concentrated a bit
more on the human sadness, fear, pain, etc. Like I would've
had a bunch of babies and old people and handicapped people
get knocked over and blown up, to show that nobody is safe
from the ultimate robot destructors.


 

offline Sano on 2009-12-27 19:25 [#02355158]
Points: 2502 Status: Lurker | Followup to jnasato: #02355157



Shit melodramatic music, awful CGI, no real actors, cliché
plot, guess this is a blockbuster in the making.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2009-12-27 19:43 [#02355162]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Sano: #02355158



Your problem is you NEED films like this more than you're
needed. You couldn't be pompous and 'subversive' without
crap films. 8 )


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-12-28 17:57 [#02355317]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to yoyoyoyo: #02354794



so it's a hollywood version of the short film?


 

offline yoyoyoyo from Sweden on 2009-12-28 18:18 [#02355321]
Points: 3200 Status: Regular | Followup to AphexAcid: #02355317



alt står här


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-12-29 06:46 [#02355404]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to yoyoyoyo: #02355321



vilken historia egentligen. tummen upp för honom


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2009-12-29 07:55 [#02355407]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



awesome. thanks for posting.


 


Messageboard index